| AA | AA | |||
|
Cancer
| ||||
|
Don't
fight the system. Alle acties komend uit wraak of ego zullen mislukken. Alleen acties vanuit een hart en ziel zullen slagen. In deze blog geef ik mijn zienswijze van de huidige wereld weer. | ||||
| ||||
|
Cancer is Fungus
and curable with Baking soda Dr. Simoncini cancer therapy - treat cancer with Sodium Bicarbonate.
Dr. Simoncini is a roman doctor specialising in oncology, diabetology and in metabolic disorders. Cancer is a fungus But Some estimates currently attribute 15% to 20% of all cancers to infectious pathogen causes. In future, this percentage may be revised upwards if the pathogens currently associated with cancers (such as those listed below) are proven to actually cause those cancers. (Note: for the sake of completeness, some infectious pathogens known to cause cancers are included in the list, in addition to the infectious pathogens associated with cancers.) Adrenal tumor is associated
with BK virus and simian virus 40 Breast cancer is associated with mouse mammary tumor virus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human papillomaviruses. Liver cancer. Hepatocellular
carcinoma can be caused by hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and by
the helminth Schistosoma japonicum. How important bicarbonate and being alkaline Stomach Sodium Bicarbonate is made in the stomach. For every molecule of sodium bicarbonate produced in the stomach, an equal amount of HCL is produced. HCL acid is a waste product of sodium bicarbonate production. The formula is NaCL + H2O + CO2 = NaHCO3 + HCL. The sodium bicarbonate in the stomach creates even more alkalization of the food in the stomach and prepares it to be transformed into stem cells in the small intestine. The HCL acid falls into the gastric pits away from the food. The normal pH of the stomach with food is 7.2 or higher. Yes, you can drink alkaline water with your meals to buffer or neutralize the poisonous HCL. Pancreas - Pancreatic Juice Pancreatic juice contains sodium bicarbonate which neutralizes the acidic material from the stomach. Brunner's glands Brunner's glands (or duodenal
glands) are compound tubular submucosal glands found in that portion of
the duodenum which is above the hepatopancreatic sphincter (Sphincter
of Oddi). The main function of these glands is to produce a mucus-rich
alkaline secretion (containing bicarbonate) in order to: Liver - Bile Bile has a golden colour and is nearly isotonic with blood plasma. The bile contains NaCl and bicarbonate in concentrations similar to those of plasma, but the bile contains more Ca2+ (bound to bile acids) than plasma. We normally produce 0.5-1 litre of hepatic bile per day with bile salts, lecithin, cholesterol and 1.5 g of bile pigments. The liver secretes bile, which is stored in the gall bladder between meals. During digestion, bile is excreted along the bile duct (from the gall bladder) and the hepatic duct (from the liver) into the duodenum (the first part of the small intestine). Bile is an aqueous mixture containing several substances, including bicarbonate ions to neutralize the acidic chyme arriving from the stomach, and bile salts to emulsify fats in the first stage of their breakdown. Kidneys Produce Bicarbonate The kidneys alone produce about two hundred and fifty grams (about half a pound) of bicarbonate per day in an attempt to neutralize acid in the body. Bicarbonate ions neutralize the acid conditions required for chronic inflammatory reactions. Hence, sodium bicarbonate is of benefit in the treatment of a range of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Sodium bicarbonate is a well studied and used medicine with known effects.
Burzynski Cancer Cure Finally Released by The Feds Houston doctor, Stanislaw Burzynski has won yet another huge victory against the medical establishment. But, instead of the win being reported from every television and radio in the United States, it barely squeaked into existence. Why? Because Dr. Burzynski can cure cancer without the traditional western medical treatments and this doesn’t make Western medicine supporters happy. Antineoplastons, combined with the remarkable new gene-targeted therapy, threaten to destroy the economy created on the traditional treatment of Cancer and the care of Cancer patients in Western Medicine. By curing the cancers, there no longer needs to be excessively costly treatments and support given the patient. Patients don’t need additional medicine to treat the symptoms created from the traditional treatments. By curing the cancer, the money dries up. Just recently, the Burzynski Research Institute, Inc (BRI) sent a press release to the media alerting them to the lifting of a two-year partial clinical hold on an investigational new drug that had been submitted for Antineoplastons A10/AS2-1 Injections. These allows for Phase 3 trials to begin for patients who have just learned they have cancer. For now, the Phase 3 trial will be dealing with Diffuse Instrinsic Brainstem Glioma. There are four phases of clinical trials in cancer treatment. Each of the phases focuses on a different purpose. The data gathered provides the FDA with scientific data they claim will prove the worth and potential success of the treatment: -Phase One: Safety determination of new treatment -Phase Two: Response determination of a certain cancer to new treatment -Phase Three: Verify that standard treatment is less effective than new treatment -Phase Four: Find more specific information about the new treatment after it has been approved for human use In addition to prescribing Antineoplastons, Dr. Burzynski’s clinic analyzes 24,000 different genes and then prescribe petro-chemical based medications and diet changes based on their individual needs. This is in direct contrast to the traditional treatment a Western Oncologist would prescribe. These and other doctors are trained to prescribe medicines which are the most likely to work for most people. The individual treatment Burzynski gives his patients have become much easier now through advancements in study of the human genome. Recently US Government agents, members of the big pharmaceutical companies and other individuals worked with one of Burzynski’s own research scientists to file eleven patents on the very research of Antineoplaston medical technology. One must wonder if Dr. Burzynski’s practice is such quackery, as the mainstream would have us believe, why would these individuals seek to patent the integral part of the treatment? The patents were not awarded to the individuals attempting to hijack them, but only after a Grand Jury found no reason to bring criminal proceedings against Burzynski. This was the establishment’s fourth witch hunt. They’d tried to incarcerate him three other times for using the same technology they were quickly trying to patent.
The Burzynski Clinic Innovative and cutting-edge
Personalized Cancer Therapy Our Approach to Cancer: Our goal is to provide sophisticated cancer care utilizing a personalized and targeted therapy approach. Our personalized cancer therapy utilizes an understanding of each patient’s genetic make-up to unravel the biology of their cancer and identifies effective treatment strategies using targeted therapies that are aimed at specific genes or proteins that are found only in cancer cells or their environment. About the Burzynski Clinic Established in 1977, the Burzynski
Clinic has grown to be a nationally and internationally recognized cancer
center that provides advanced and cutting-edge cancer treatments. For over 35 years, Dr. Burzynski’s cancer research and patient care has been inspired by the philosophy of the physician Hippocrates: ‘First, do no harm’. Therefore, our approach to treatment is ‘personalized’ in an attempt to maximize effectiveness and minimize side effects for each cancer patient. In everything we do, we are proudly committed to these principles of cancer treatment and to continued cancer research. Our mission is to beat cancer. Personalized Medicine Personalized cancer therapy utilizes an understanding of each patient’s genetic make-up to unravel the biology of their cancer. Using this information, our physicians attempt to identify treatment strategies that may be more effective and cause fewer side effects than would be expected with standard treatments. By performing genetic tests and analyses, our physicians customize treatment to each patient’s needs.
Due to the international character of our clinic, we are able to assist our patients in various foreign languages. About Dr. Stanislaw R. Burzynski burzynskiDr. Burzynski, a nationally and internationally recognized physician/investigator, pioneered the use of biologically active peptides for the treatment of cancer. In 1967, at the age of 24, Dr. Burzynski graduated first in his class of 250 students from the Medical Academy in Lublin, Poland. It was at this time that he identified naturally occurring human peptides, which were deficient in cancer patients. He concluded that these peptides played a role in preventing the growth of cancer cells. In 1968, he earned a PhD degree and became one of the youngest physician/investigators in Poland to hold both a MD and PhD degree. Between 1970 and 1977, he received funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) for his work as an investigator and Assistant Professor at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, TX. During this time he authored/coauthored 16 publications, including five detailing his work on naturally occurring human peptides and their effect on cancer - four of which were co-authored by investigators associated with the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center or the Baylor College School of Medicine. In May 1977, Dr. Burzynski received a Certificate of Appreciation from the Baylor College of Medicine that acknowledged his contributions to the ‘Advancement of Medical Education, Research, and Health Care’. In 1977 that the Burzynski Clinic was established in Houston, TX. Since then, more than 8,000 patients have received treatment at the clinic, including more than 2,300 cancer patients who have been treated in FDA reviewed and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved clinical trials program of Antineoplastons, investigational agents that derived from Dr. Burzynski’s early investigations of naturally occurring human peptides. Currently, new FDA-reviewed Phase II and III clinical studies utilizing Antineoplastons are awaiting Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval prior to patient enrollment. Dr. Burzynski has extensive experience treating cancer with combinations of targeted agents and the drug phenylbutyrate (PB), which targets multiple genetic abnormalities simultaneously. Dr. Burzynski is the author/co-author of over 300 scientific publication/presentations. He has collaborated with investigators at the NCI, the Medical College of Georgia, the Imperial College of Science and Technology of London, the University of Kurume Medical School in Japan, and the University of Turin Medical School in Italy, among others. He is a member of several prestigious organizations, including the American Association of Cancer Research (AACR), the Society for Neuroscience, the Society for Neuro-oncology, the Royal Medical Association (U.K.), and the Academy of Medical Ethics. As of June 2015, he held 244 patents in 35 countries covering 17 proprietary scientific inventions.
Every Cancer Can be Cured in Weeks explains Dr Leonard Coldwell I can attest, personally, to
everything Dr Coldwell says, because I have, in recent weeks, cured myself
of an "orchitis" which, whilst not officially being a cancer,
is as close as I would ever want to get. Google it, so I can save myself
describing the gory details. Colloidal silver, bicarbonate of soda, apple
cider vinegar, lemon juice and a spray potassium/iodine solution were
the weapons I used to kill the orchitis. It took a week or so. It was
a complete miracle.
Native American Tea Cures Cancer. Kept Secret for Over 100 years! A simple inexpensive four herb
tea that cures cancer? Even AIDS maybe? This has been a critical concern
since Essiac tea was introduced in Canada during the early 1920’s.
For over 50 years, a humble nurse used the tea successfully with many
terminal cancer patients from her clinic in the tiny Canadian village
of Bracebridge, north of Toronto. Essiac’s Origin Essiac Makes It’s Way
to the USA Essiac Ingredients Essiac Caveats However, there is a possibility
of getting Turkish rhubarb root cultivated in North America, as well as
the powdered sheep sorrel complete with roots. There are many people who
have survived cancer, and a few have used Essiac to cure AIDS as well.
Many have improved their overall health by using Essiac Tea as a tonic.
Yet there are some who complain about little or no effect from Essiac.
The Man Who Discovered The Cause Of Cancer Wrote A Book On Curing It Dr. Otto Warburg was the man who discovered the cause of cancer, he was awarded the nobel prize in 1931 for his work. Initially it was my understanding that he discovered cancer but he actually discovered the cause which in my opinion is even more valuable than discovering cancer. Many people have recognized a problem, a disease, a tumorous lump growing on someone and labeling it a disease. The cause of that disease is even more important and relevant than the disease itself if you want to do something about it. His work came to be known as the “Warburg Effect” or the “Warburg Hypothesis” which basically entailed that cancer cells live off sugar (glycolysis) and that they also thrive in an anaerobic environment. These causes lead me to believe the opposite would help to reverse the cancer growth. What do you think? He’s one of the most relevant figures in our history when it comes to cancer, what causes it and how to really treat it. Most people have no idea who this man is though, why is that? is it because of what he has to say about cancer and about disease in general? There’s no question that he was a brilliant man during his time. The first man to discover the cause of cancer is somewhat like the first man landing on the moon! it’s just the micro and macro scale of things. His discovery led him to certain conclusions. These conclusions that he was led to may be true or false to you but i’m going to leave that up to you to decide. I trust this man (the discoverer of it) more than the American Cancer Society or any other medical organization though because he’s worked to get to a place of excellence and understanding of cancer. Large organizations that take your money for a ‘cure’ or to walk around in a circle wearing pink shirts haven’t done a whole lot with the BILLIONS of dollars poured in for research. Oddly enough Dr. Otto Warburg gave his two cents on what can be done to treat and heal cancer and what changes need to take place in the human body for the human body to no longer have cancer. Let me say that again! the man who discovered cancer shared practical information on how cancer can cease to exist based on his understanding of cancer in his research. So what was his thoughts on cancer? First, he was quoted as saying:
Beyond this Dr. Otto Warburg also said… “Cancerous tissues are acidic, whereas healthy tissues are alkaline. Water splits into H+ and OH- ions, if there is an excess of H+, it is acidic; if there is an excess of OH- ions, then it is alkaline.” “All normal cells have an absolute requirement for oxygen, but cancer cells can live without oxygen – a rule without exception. “Deprive a cell 35% of its oxygen for 48 hours and it may become cancerous.” Dr. Warburg has made it clear that the root cause of cancer is oxygen deficiency, which creates an acidic state in the human body. Dr Warburg also discovered that cancer cells are anaerobic (do not breathe oxygen) and cannot survive in the presence of high levels of oxygen, as found in an alkaline state. Dr. Wargburg understood the importance of oxygen and an alkaline environment around the cancerous growth. He even went so far as to say that “No Disease, including cancer can live in an alkaline environment” too. So from Dr. Warburg some of the best cancer and disease prevention (and healing, according to him) advice would be to give your boxy more oxygen and an alkaline environment. How do you do that? More deep breathing. More nature. If you live in the city you are being bombarded by chemicals and decreasing oxygen levels. The country and nature have higher levels of pure oxygen and this was one of the keys according to Dr. Warbug to help the body be in an alkaline environment. Not only that but eating alkaline foods such as vegetables and fruits can help to alkalize the body environment as well. Believe it or not Dr. Otto
Warburg also wrote a book entitled “Cancer: It’s cause and it’s
Cure” which blows my mind. I recommend listening to the recent interview
on my podcast with Ty Bollinger as well as reading the Top 6 Cancer Prevention
Foods.
The Case of the Incredible Disappearing Cancer Patients! It’s been almost 20 years since I met my first disappearing patient — a nurse in her early 40s, let’s call her Kate. Kate was diagnosed with breast cancer. As a nurse, she had seen the results of breast cancer treatments. She was terrified, and determined. She was not heading for surgery, nor chemotherapy, nor radiation. But Kate worked in a hospital. She worked with the doctors who diagnosed her cancer, and she worked with the surgeon, who wanted to schedule her into surgery “as soon as possible.” The first thing Kate did was slow down. She did some research. It didn’t take her long to remind herself that in Canada, and in the USA, the treatments for cancer are akin to law. No hospital would dare deviate from the deadly three (cut, poison, burn). Kate’s cancer was not large. She had been tested for cancer last year and no cancer was found. She knew it took many years for cancers to develop. At first, she was furious, “If it is here today, it must have been here last year. Why didn’t you find it last year?” It had not metastasized. It was not growing rapidly and was not affecting her health in any way. In theory, she had lots of time. So, she took some time. But Kate didn’t look for magic cures. She didn’t search for the latest “cancer medicine.” She wasn’t interested in curing herself. She knew she was a nurse, not a doctor. She searched instead for the “cured” – patients who were diagnosed with cancer, and no longer had cancer. She knew from her work in the hospital, from conversations with patients, and with some staff, that these people existed — but from the perspective of the medical establishment, they seemed to disappear. It didn’t take her long to find some patients who claimed they were cured. They hadn’t disappeared from life. They were eating, drinking, loving, and living full healthy and prosperous lives. But according to the medical records, they didn’t exist. They were “never cured.” The medical system treated their cures as “anecdotal.” It ignored them. There was no attempt by any doctors to understand what happened to these cancer patients. They were no longer sick. The medical system looks after sick patients, treats sick patients. These patients were not sick. Kate looked and listened. Her interest was not clinical science vs. anecdotal evidence. Her interest was personal. She talked, listened, compared stories. From several, she learned about a clinic that did not claim to cure cancer. It did not use medicines to treat cancers. But patients were cured, somehow. This clinic was not in Canada. It was not in the USA. She would have to go to Mexico to learn more. There are lots of alternative treatment clinics in Mexico. Are some of them valid, using important techniques to cure cancers? Are some of them scams, wanting to take money from desperate clients? Do some of them have a cure that works sometimes, but might not work for her? Kate didn’t know. She did more research. She called the clinic. The staff did not claim to cure cancer. Claiming to cure cancer is dangerous, even for a clinic outside of North America. They suggested Kate visit the clinic and see what happens there, no charge for a visit, but she would need to pay for her travel to Mexico. Kate had done her research. She had met and talked to patients whose cancers had disappeared. Kate made her decision. She was familiar with cancer diagnosis techniques in Canada. She had undergone a physical examination, a mammogram, that detected a lump in her breast. Then she had a biopsy, where tissue was taken from the lump and was sent to a lab for analysis. The lab technician tested and examined the sample and issued a diagnosis “cancer” or “not cancer.” Once the diagnosis is issued, everybody swings into action. Kate knew that the mammogram had a high false positive rate and a false negative rate. Many people who are diagnosed with a “possible cancer” by a mammogram do not actually have cancer. She was also aware that cancer biopsies have a false positive rate and a false negative rate, as well. Her work in the hospital, with real patients, had made this very clear. She didn’t really know for certain if she had cancer. Her surgeon, on the other hand, was still pressing her to schedule treatment. Kate knew one thing. She had time. She cashed out some savings and booked a “holiday” in Mexico. At the clinic, Kate was surprised that there was no “cancer diagnosis.” They did check the presence and size of the lump on her breast. But they didn’t repeat the biopsy. The clinic read her diagnostic reports, but did not investigate them further. There was instead a very thorough analysis completed by a suite of doctors. It took two full days of tests and interviews, if I remember correctly. Kate was asked about her family’s medical histories. She gave blood samples. She was questioned extensively about her diet, about what she eats on a regular basis. What foods does she like and eat often. What foods does she not like and never eat. Doctors examined her lungs, her heart, liver, and other bodily organs with various tests. Her immune system was tested. Extensive interviews about her life, her work, her relationships, and more. At the time I talked to Kate, I didn’t realize that she was not getting a “medical analysis,” she was actually getting a “healthicine analysis.” Her tests and questions fit perfectly to the hierarchy of healthicine: genetics, nutrition, cells, tissues, organs, bodily systems, body, mind, spirit, and community. Kate’s genetics were analyzed through family history. There may have been further genetic analysis, I don’t remember all of the details. Her nutritional status was analyzed, not just by analyzing what she ate, and what she preferred to eat, but also by studying what she didn’t like to eat, what she deliberately never ate, what foods she believed she was allergic to. Her cells and tissues were analyzed directly, through blood samples and physical examination, and indirectly through medical history and other tests. Many of her organs were tested for healthiness. Her bodily systems, immune system, circulatory system, respiratory system, hormonal systems and more were analyzed and assessed. Her physical body was measured, weighed, and examined. Her mental health was assessed, as well as her spiritual healthiness. She was in good spirits, even in light of a potentially life threatening illness. Her community health was analyzed as well. Her family, her relationships with her children, her spouse, her parents, her work community, and more. After a few days, Kate met with a group of doctors to discuss her health, not her illness, her healthiness. Diagnosing illness is difficult. Analyzing healthiness is more complex. It took several doctors and several hours for Kate to learn and understand what they had learned about her healthinesses and her unhealthinesses. They then “prescribed” two weeks, if I remember correctly, of healthiness training, tailored to Kate’s specific situation. She spent the next two weeks at the clinic, learning to be healthier, not learning how to be “healthier in principle,” rather – learning what Kate needed to do to make her diet, her body, her mind, her spirits, and even her relationships with her communities healthier. She could not change her work community. But she could change how she reacted to and interacted with it – to improve her own health. After two weeks of learning at the clinic, her breast lump had started to shrink. Kate went back to Canada, to put her learning into action. The lump disappeared. Her diagnosis was still there on paper. But her “cancer” had disappeared. She was retested at her hospital and no cancer was found. Then Kate began to disappear. When the surgeon asked again, she explained that she was not going to surgery. The surgeon looked away. He refused to look her in the eye after that. But Kate didn’t disappear from her family. She went back to her family. She didn’t disappear from her job. She went back to her job. She disappeared from the cancer system. Her cancer disappeared, so, as a cancer patient, she disappeared. Was she cured? We don’t know. There is no useful definition of a cancer cure. No medical or scientific test that can prove a patient has been cured of cancer. Our cancer treatment statistics have no count for people who are cured of cancer. Patients that are cured, whether they are cured with medicines or not, are not counted. No breast cancer patients are officially cured by medicine. If their cancer goes away without treatment, they disappear from statistics. If their cancer is killed by radiation, chemotherapy or surgery, they are not cured, they are a “survivor.” Everyone knows that cancer survivors are always waiting for the cancer to reappear. Their symptoms are in remission, but their cancer is not cured. They are not cured. With no proof of a cure, it might just be hidden. Kate no longer has cancer. She paid, from her own pocket, for her trip to a clinic in Mexico. After the trip, her cancer disappeared. She had medical insurance. But her insurance wouldn’t pay for her trip. Insurance pays for treatments, not for cures. It pays for treatments, even if they fail. But it does not pay for success. Success disappears. There are two ways for a cancer patient to disappear. You might be cured by health. Or you might be cured by a medicine that is not approved. In both cases, the medical system will ignore the cure, and ignore the patient. In healthicine, there are no incurable diseases. If it is not curable – it is not a disease, it is a handicap, a disability, a deficiency, or simply an attribute of the person. All diseases can be cured by definition. I have since met several cancer patients who have disappeared, and not just cancer patients. Maybe you have too? I’ve met more by internet, email, etc. There is no way for me to determine if a disappeared patient actually had cancer, if their treatment cured their cancer, if their body cured their cancer or if they still have cancer. We can only tell if there is another cancer diagnosis. Nothing can be told from the absence of a diagnosis. There is no way for any doctor to tell either. There are no tests for a cancer cure. There is no way to recognize, much less document a cancer cure. There are no statistics for cancers cured. Many cured patients don’t disappear quietly. They speak out. They write books and newspaper articles. They blog. But it doesn’t matter. They still don’t count. Once cured, they disappear. The medical system does not study their cases, does not study their diagnosis, does not study their cures. For chronic diseases, like cancer, arthritis, diabetes, heart disease, even obesity, and many more, there are no techniques to document “cured patients.” As a result, there are no statistics for “cured patients” of any chronic illness. Once they are cured, they disappear. Health doesn’t cure illness, it disappears illness. And medicine doesn’t count people who have disappeared. To your health, Tracy Thanks to http://wakeup-world.com/2015/10/16/the-case-of-the-incredible
Cellphone radiation CAN cause CANCER The scientists were right — your cell phone can give you cancer. There have long been whispers of a cancer connection from your cell — and a new study backs up the claims. "These data are a clear sign of the real risks this kind of radiation poses for human health," study author Igor Yakymenko said. Yakymenko’s meta-study — basically a study of hundreds of other studies — reveals many findings of previous researchers into how radiofrequency from your phone can damage DNA. That damage can add up over time and cause a variety of health problems, like cancer, headaches, fatigue and even skin problems. For example, using your phone for just 20 minutes a day for five years increased the risk of one type of brain tumor threefold, and using the phone an hour a day for four years upped the risk of some tumors three to five times, Yakymenko said. But even though the risk of brain and related cancers is low — in 2012, there were 6.4 cases per 100,000 U.S. adults — Yakymenko says we should be on alert because ailments can take up to 30 years to develop. “(Our) data were obtained on adults who used cell phones mostly up to 10 years as adults,” he said. “The situation can dramatically differ for children who use cells phone in childhood, when their biology much more sensitive to hazardous factors, and will use it over the life.” To minimize your risk, use your phone less and go hands-free to keep the frequency away from your head, Yakymenko said.
The number one reason blamed for childhood deaths in America used to be accidents; now it’s cancer ABC News is reporting today that cancer has officially outranked every other cause of childhood death in this country:
Cancer is the leading cause
of childhood death in the United States, with 13,500 new diagnoses each
year according to the American Cancer Institute. Cancer in America has seen a sharp increase over the last 100 years across all age groups. Data from the U.S. Public Health
Service estimates that cancer death rates in 1900 were around 64 per 100,000.
That number has increased almost threefold to 188.7 per 100,000 in 2005. This dramatic increase over a relatively short span of time obviously suggests environmental factors are at play here. So why haven’t all these charitable “run for the cure” cancer drives - fundraisers that happen year after year after year as cancer rates only continue to grow - ever cured anything? The Cancer Prevention Coalition (CPC) notes that cancer equals big business in this country:
Winning the war on cancer means preventing cancer. Yet cancer is a multi-billion dollar business. Isn’t preventing cancer bad for business? It is for the pharmaceutical and mammography businesses. These industries have intricate ties to U. S. policy makers, directing research funds to ensure their continued profits in cancer diagnosis/treatment. If prevention is key to crushing cancer, then finding out what is actually causing this cancer epidemic from independent studies not funded by the very companies that stand to profit off pointing fingers in the wrong direction is the first step. What is causing all this cancer, especially the rise in children? Two big factors may be chemicals and electromagnetic radiation. A whopping 70-90% of any average U.S. grocery store is filled with processed foods full of chemical additives and preservatives, many of which are genetically modified, in addition to the fact that a vast majority of U.S. food is tainted with pesticides. The CPC discusses multiple studies that have come to the same conclusion: continual exposure to the multitude of carcinogenic pesticides in this country’s food supply is killing our kids: As documented by the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA), residues of numerous carcinogenic pesticides
are commonly found in most fruits and vegetables. Additionally, milk and
other dairy products are often laden with carcinogenic pesticides and
antibiotics. Should pesticide in our food really ever be considered “acceptable”? Michael Taylor, former Monsanto Vice President for Public Policy and our current Food Safety Czar in this Twilight Zone we all live in, wrote “The De Minimis Interpretation of the Delaney Clause - Legal and Policy Rationale” advocating a change in the interpretation of the 1958 Delaney Clause back in 1988. On it’s face, Delaney literally stated that no carcinogenic agents could be added to processed foods. Taylor’s interpretation paved the way to altering Delaney to be interpreted so that small amounts of known carcinogens could be added to our food, all without regard to the cumulative negative health effects. Taylor wrote this, by the way, while working at a law firm contracted by Monsanto. Another potential factor is the continual bathing of our growing children’s brains and bodies in electromagnetic radiation (EMR). Estimates show that those of us living in modern-day America are experiencing 100,000,000 times more electromagnetic frequency (EMF) than our grandparents did simply by existing. Incidents of brain tumors have also been found to be higher in Western, developed nations. Everything from cell phones to cell towers going up everywhere to household appliances to computers… even cars emit EMF. Many of these technologies were never tested for potential harmful effects. Research has found EMF does have an adverse effect on tissues and cells, and this non-ionizing radiation has been classified as a carcinogen or potential carcinogen. The top two childhood cancers are, leukemia Studies have linked both EMF exposure and childhood leukemia (for a few examples, see here, here, here and here), and EMF exposure to childhood brain tumors (see here, here and here). Belgium just banned cell phones specifically designed for children up to age 7 based on this risk. Armed with this information, recommendations have been suggested for limiting a child’s exposure to pressing cell phones up to their skulls via hands-free devices or even using speakerphone options. WI-FI exposure in the house can be limited by opting to hard wire computers to modems and unplugging computers and modems at night or when not in use. In a pediatric nursing article “Cell Phones and Children - Follow the Precautionary Road” Suzanne Rosenberg wrote, “While the government has deemed RF radiation to be safe, there is no current significant research to make this claim.” Just like the abundance of chemicals in our food, there is a vested interest in keeping a lid on information regarding just how dangerous this continual radiation exposure could be. Cancer rates have risen to epidemic levels if estimates now show one in two adults will get cancer sometime in their lifetime. With childhood cancer as the number one child killer, what kind of cancer odds will our children face in their future? Forget racing for the cure; we have to start focusing on the cause.
How many people have died from chemotherapy, not cancer? If you cripple your immunity, what have you got? If you wipe out all of your good bacteria in your gut, what's left? Did you know that if you survive with chemotherapy and cancer for five years you are statistically entered in the "cancer books" as a survivor, even if you drop dead the next day due to chemo-overload, organ strangulation or total lack of immunity? The chemotherapy and radiation treatments are leading to death stemming from the simple common cold or the flu. That's right, then pneumonia takes over, because you have no more white blood cells to fight off infections. Who knew? Of course, we can't count up all the chemo deaths, because the hospitals and oncologists will always simply say that "the cancer spread" and that was the cause of termination. That's what goes "on the books." If you're taking chemo treatments and you have no immunity, because chemotherapy demolishes it (even medical doctors admit this), any common infection can become your demise. The next flu could be the end of you. For example, a staff infection from handling raw chicken could be the culprit of the beginning of the end for a cancer survivor who continues taking chemo. The next infection from GM E. coli or Salmonella and you're done for. Simple food poisoning from fast food and you're six feet under. Where are those statistics? They're nowhere -- because you "can't prove it." Being shot up with antibiotics and viruses by a medical doctor and nurses who agree that you need mercury, aluminum and formaldehyde to "create immunity" or beat back bacteria/viruses -- that could be the straw the breaks the camel's back (meaning you). Catching a superbug at the hospital, meaning a virus and/or bacterium that's immune to antibiotics, is quite common nowadays, so that bed with blue sheets they've made for you in the "recovery room" is really the lion's den of infectious pathogens that enter your system and NEVER leave again. Again, no statistics. How can someone die from chemotherapy
overdose? People die from chemotherapy overdose because they are already weak and consume all the wrong foods. Cancer can be reversed. Organic sulfur, hemp seed oil, chaga mushrooms, reishi mushrooms, baking soda, 35% food-grade hydrogen peroxide, Cannabis sativa, organic raw coconut oil, aloe and actual fluoride-free spring water could all be your ticket to a cancer-free world, but who's saying what? Are the medical doctors telling you this? Heck no. They can't. They would lose their license and make no money. You can overdose from chemotherapy, but the results of the tests won't show it. Every cell in your body will be SCREAMING IT, but the crooked, Western Medicine regime that controls the cancer industry will never allow it to hit the "peer-reviewed" medical journals, that are all as biased as the day they were "born." Yes, we've all read JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, and we've seen the ads in the back for cigarettes and pharmaceutical manufacturers that pay top dollar for that AMA "seal of approval." Don't "overdose." Watch cancer and its "spider web" of mutated cells in animation while you think about organic food and ALL of your choices -- because it is always your choice to live healthy. And now it's time for the scary
statistics of cancer Lung and Bronchus Cancer:
225,000; Resulting Deaths: 160,000 Last thing to consider: Seventy-five percent of all physicians in the world refuse chemotherapy for themselves! Look into natural remedies and NEVER AGAIN let the cancer business make you second guess the power of organic food to heal.
CANCER IS A SCAM Cancer can be cured in some
easy steps and more and more we see that there are simple altinatives.
NO Chemo NO Radiotherapy is needed and as we know the biggest liars are
the doctors who promote these treatments!
The lost interview with the late Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez: Chemotherapy drugs are derived from World War I nerve gas chemicals (NaturalNews) Natural News contributor Jonathan Landsman has just publicly published a "lost" interview with Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, the holistic cancer treatment doctor who passed away earlier this week. This video interview, never before released to the public, reveals truly mind-blowing information about the failure of chemotherapy and why holistic approaches to cancer treatment work far better than chemo. The complete interview is revealed below. To access a massive library of other private interviews with pioneering doctors and healers, join the NaturalHealth365 Inner Circle, featuring an astonishing 300 exclusive interviews with the industry's greatest pioneers. Click here to search for "chemotherapy" on GoodGopher.com, the search engine for truth seekers. Background info from Jonathan
Landsman Dr. Gonzalez was a staunch supporter of medical freedom and informed consent. Unlike the conventional cancer industry and its fear tactics, Dr. Gonzalez NEVER tried to convince someone to accept his therapy over standard medical treatments like, surgery, chemotherapy or radiation. Western medicine largely ignores the truth about how to successfully overcome a cancer diagnosis In this interview, Dr. Gonzalez revealed to Jonathan Landsman, Host of NaturalHealth365, "the single most important determinant as to how a patient does whatever they choose to do... is their belief system." He went on to say, "if they don't fundamentally believe in what I do or what alternative practitioners do, whether I think they should or not -- doesn't matter, they shouldn't do it." Watch the full interview here: As host of the NaturalHealth365 INNER CIRCE, I've helped create over 300 audio/video programs with over 200 integrative healthcare professionals -- including dozens of cancer-specific programs exposing the pros and cons of most known cancer treatment protocols. In the video interview shown here, Dr. Gonzalez details the (almost) unbelievable history of chemotherapy, its shockingly high failure rate and why most cancer patients have been kept in the dark about its true origins and effectiveness. This video program was exclusively produced for NaturalHealth365 INNER CIRCLE monthly subscribers – but, in light of the recent death of Dr. Gonzalez, we felt compelled to release the entire interview. Please share this important video with your family and friends... especially those dealing with a cancer diagnosis. Cancer doctors would be shocked
to learn the true history of chemotherapy In this exclusive video interview, Dr. Gonzalez revealed the unspeakable history of chemotherapy, including these truths: "During WWII, the Department of Defense had all these stock piles of nerve gas from WWI and they weren't using them in WWII. And someone at the Department of Defense had this brilliant idea to try and convert this nerve gas into useful therapeutic modalities." "Very few people realize the whole generation of chemotherapeutic drugs that are being used today – and there are over 100 of them – really developed from poisonous nerve gas developed for warfare." Sadly, most doctors are uninformed about how chemotherapy was first developed and the basis for its usage today. The facts are truly astonishing. You can watch the entire (exclusive) NaturalHealth365 INNER CIRCLE interview with Jonathan Landsman and Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez on YouTube at this link. Nicholas Gonzalez, MD reveals
the truth about chemotherapy Locally we have an oncologist
(Dr Pinedo) who does tests over and over on local people and makes people
afraid by telling them you have to prevent cancer! Over 800 mammography
are made MONTHLY on a population of 150.000 people!! People, you can be free of cancer and get rid of it. It's a matter of believe in the easy steps and keep far away from these killing treatments and the killing pharmaceutical industries.
Ask your doctor what he will do if they find cancer on him or by his family. NOT ONE DOCTOR will give himself Chemo or Radiotherapy!! Why are these "deadly cures" only for you?
Dr Pinedo Curacao who is proud of his 800 mammography monthly. Interesting Cancer - Sugar Dr. Otto Warburg was the man who discovered the cause of cancer, he was awarded the nobel prize in 1931 for his work. Initially it was my understanding that he discovered cancer but he actually discovered the cause which in my opinion is even more valuable than discovering cancer. Many people have recognized a problem, a disease, a tumorous lump growing on someone and labeling it a disease. The cause of that disease is even more important and relevant than the disease itself if you want to do something about it. His work came to be known as the “Warburg Effect” or the “Warburg Hypothesis” which basically entailed that cancer cells live off sugar (glycolysis) and that they also thrive in an anaerobic environment.
Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Cancer An Opportunity for Improvement Over the past 30 years, awareness and screening have led to an emphasis on early diagnosis of cancer. Although the goals of these efforts were to reduce the rate of late-stage disease and decrease cancer mortality, secular trends and clinical trials suggest that these goals have not been met; national data demonstrate significant increases in early-stage disease, without a proportional decline in later-stage disease. What has emerged has been an appreciation of the complexity of the pathologic condition called cancer. The word “cancer” often invokes the specter of an inexorably lethal process; however, cancers are heterogeneous and can follow multiple paths, not all of which progress to metastases and death, and include indolent disease that causes no harm during the patient’s lifetime. Better biology alone can explain better outcomes. Although this complexity complicates the goal of early diagnosis, its recognition provides an opportunity to adapt cancer screening with a focus on identifying and treating those conditions most likely associated with morbidity and mortality. See complete rapport
Chemotherapy Kills Cancer Patients Faster Than No Treatment At All chemo drug bagWishful thinking simply won’t deter from the fact that the cancer industry is just that: an industry. Doctors, drug companies, hospitals and other key stakeholders profit heavily each time a cancer patient submits to the conventional treatment model, which typically involves injecting chemotherapy poisons into the body, blasting it with ionizing radiation or cutting off body parts — or some barbaric combination of all three. It might rub some people the wrong way to state this, especially those who’ve had to watch a loved one die from conventional cancer treatment, but each of these supposed treatments don’t actually work, in many cases. Little-known science, which the medical-industrial complex has made it a practice to ignore or cover up, reveals that, despite what the medical industry often claims, chemotherapy in particular just isn’t an effective cancer treatment. Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, Berkeley, had been studying the lifespans of cancer patients for more than 25 years when he came to the conclusion that, despite popular belief, chemotherapy doesn’t work. He witnessed a multitude of cancer patients treated with the poison die horrific deaths, many of them meeting their fate much earlier than other patients who chose no treatment at all. After investigating this further, Dr. Jones found that cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy actually died more quickly, in most cases, than those who followed their doctors’ recommendations by getting the treatment. A few number-crunching efforts later and Dr. Jones exposed a fact that the conventional cancer industry doesn’t want the world to know about its multi-billion-dollar cash cow. “People who refused treatment
lived for an average of 12 and a half years,” stated Dr. Jones about
his study’s findings, which were published in the journal Transactions
of the New York Academy of Sciences. “Those who accepted other kinds
of treatment lived on an average of only 3 years.” Did you catch that? Refusing conventional cancer treatments and doing nothing resulted in cancer patients living more than four times longer than their more compliant counterparts. This is something you’ll never hear about from the mainstream media, which continues to peddle the myth that cancer patients somehow need poison injected into their bodies in order to survive and reach “cure” status. Dr. Jones’ study also found that the same is true concerning conventional treatments for breast cancer. Women with breast cancer who refused chemotherapy, radiation and surgery — and remained untreated — likewise lived four times longer than women who went under the knife or agreed to be poisoned with chemicals. As admitted in a more recent study published in the journal Clinical Oncology back in 2004, chemotherapy is really only effective about 2 percent of the time for all cancers. And this is based on the standard five-year survival rate criteria, which isn’t technically indicative of a cure — even though health authorities often like to claim it is. More on this is available here: A separate study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association back in 1979 found that many of the most common procedures for diagnosing and treating breast cancer, nearly all of which are still used today, have done nothing to lower breast cancer rates or increase survival for breast cancer patients. Two other studies, one of out Israel that was published in 1978 and another out of the UK that was published in The Lancet in 1980, came to similar findings. “Overall survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved in the past 10 years, despite increasing use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for treatment of metastasis,” explains the Lancet study, entitled “Failure of Chemotherapy to Prolong Survival in a Group of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.” “Furthermore, there has
been no improvement in survival from first metastasis, and survival may
even have been shortened in some patients given chemotherapy.” There are solutions to treating cancer naturally, though, that don’t involve just doing nothing — which is still clearly better than going the conventional route.
People Do Not Die From Cancer! People Die From Chemotherapy And In Terrible Pain! HORRIFYING: Professor From Berkely College Says: The cancer industry is just an industry after all! Doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and other stakeholders in this industry profit whenever a patient accepts the intoxicating treatment that is chemotherapy, radiation or surgery to remove parts of the body. Science covers this, despite the claims from the medical industry that chemotherapy does not work in the fight against cancer. Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, Berkeley, has studied the life expectancy of cancer patients for more than 25 years, when he concluded that chemotherapy does not work. He testified that chemotherapy patients often die a horrible death. They also died much faster and more painful than patients who opted for a different approach. What he found was that chemotherapy actually shortened the life and killed patients, and everything is kept secret because of the millions of dollars in play! “People who refused chemotherapy
treatment live an average of 12 and a half years longer than the people
who are receiving chemotherapy,” Dr. Johns said in his study published
in the New Your Academy of Sciences. “People who accept chemotherapy
die within 3 years, and many just a few weeks after starting the treatment.”
“Patients with breast cancer who reject conventional therapy live
four times longer than those who follow the system. This is something
you will not hear in the mass media that will continue to spread the myth
that chemotherapy is the best medicine to fight cancer!” Another study published in 1979 in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that the most common methods for breast cancer treatment, which are still used, did nothing to reduce the rate of breast cancer or prolong life. Similar findings were published in two studies, one in Israel in 1978, and the other in Britain, published in The Lancet in 1980. Both confirmed chemotherapy did not improve the survival of breast cancer patients in that decade. “The carefully hidden truth is that many people who “died of cancer “actually have died from treatment that included chemotherapy or radiation. Chemotherapy works by killing healthy cells in the body before they destroy the cancer that can develop very slow and in some natural ways even stop and restrain,”, the study explained. Most patients who “died of cancer” actually died of malnutrition, because cancerous cells take nutrients from our body and blood and destroy the immune system, so the body cannot defend itself. Modern medicine hides the truth about cancer therapy. One treatment costs 300000-1000000$! That is why it continues offering chemotherapy to cancer patients. Chemotherapy does not remove cancer nor extend the life. It just burdens the body so much that the patients eventually die from it. With a special thanks :http://www.naturalmedicinebox.net/
Study: Radiation Therapy May Make Cancers 30x More Malignant Following on the heels of recent revelations that x-ray mammography may be contributing to an epidemic of future radiation-induced breast cancers, in a new article titled, "Radiation Treatment Generates Therapy Resistant Cancer Stem Cells From Aggressive Breast Cancer Cells," published in the journal Cancer July 1st, 2012, researchers from the Department of Radiation Oncology at the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center report that radiation treatment actually drives breast cancer cells into greater malignancy. The researchers found that even when radiation kills half of the tumor cells treated, the surviving cells which are resistant to treatment, known as induced breast cancer stem cells (iBCSCs), were up to 30 times more likely to form tumors than the nonirradiated breast cancer cells. In other words, the radiation treatment regresses the total population of cancer cells, generating the false appearance that the treatment is working, but actually increases the ratio of highly malignant to benign cells within that tumor, eventually leading to the iatrogenic (treatment-induced) death of the patient. Last month, a related study published in the journal Stem Cells titled, "Radiation-induced reprogramming of breast cells," found that ionizing radiation reprogrammed less malignant (more differentiated) breast cancer cells into iBCSCs, helping to explain why conventional treatment actually enriches the tumor population with higher levels of treatment-resistant cells. [i] A growing body of research now indicts conventional cancer treatment with chemotherapy and radiation as a major contributing cause of cancer patient mortality. The primary reason for this is the fact that cancer stem cells, which are almost exclusively resistant to conventional treatment, are not being targeted, but to the contrary, are encouraged to thrive when exposed to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In order to understand how conventional treatment drives the cancer into greater malignancy, we must first understand what cancer is.... cancer lymphocyte Tumors are actually highly organized assemblages of cells, which are surprisingly well-coordinated for cells that are supposed to be the result of strictly random mutation. They are capable of building their own blood supply (angiogenesis), are able to defend themselves by silencing cancer-suppression genes, secreting corrosive enzymes to move freely throughout the body, alter their metabolism to live in low oxygen and acidic environments, and know how to remove their own surface-receptor proteins to escape detection by white blood cells. In a previous article titled "Is Cancer An Ancient Survival Program Unmasked?" we delved deeper into this emerging view of cancer as an evolutionary throw-back and not a byproduct of strictly random mutation. Because tumors are not simply the result of one or more mutated cells "going rogue" and producing exact clones of itself (multi-mutational and clonal hypotheses), but are a diverse group of cells having radically different phenotypal characteristics, chemotherapy and radiation will affect each cell type differently. Tumors are composed of a wide range of cells, many of which are entirely benign. The most deadly cell type within a tumor or blood cancer, known as cancer stem cells (CSCs), has the ability to give rise to all the cell types found within that cancer. They are capable of dividing by mitosis to form either two stem cells (increasing the size of the stem population), or one daughter cell that goes on to differentiate into a variety of cell types, and one daughter cell that retains stem-cell properties. This means CSCs are tumorigenic (tumor-forming) and should be the primary target of cancer treatment because they are capable of both initiating and sustaining cancer. They are also increasingly recognized to be the cause of relapse and metastasis following conventional treatment. CSCs are exceptionally resistant to conventional treatment for the following reasons CSCs account for less than 1 in 10,000 cells within a particular cancer, making them difficult to destroy without destroying the vast majority of other cells comprising the tumor.[ii]
Conventional chemotherapies target differentiated and differentiating cells, which form the bulk of the tumor, but these are unable to generate new cells like the CSCs which are undifferentiated. The existence of CSCs explains why conventional cancer treatment has completely missed the boat when it comes to targeting the root cause of tumors. One reason for this is because existing cancer treatments have mostly been developed in animal models where the goal is to shrink a tumor. Because mice are most often used and their life spans do not exceed two years, tumor relapse is very difficult, if not impossible to study. The first round of chemotherapy never kills the entire tumor, but only a percentage. This phenomenon is called the fractional kill. The goal is to use repeated treatment cycles (usually six) to regress the tumor population down to zero, without killing the patient. What normally occurs is that the treatment selectively kills the less harmful populations of cells (daughter cells), increasing the ratio of CSCs to benign and/or less malignant cells. This is not unlike what happens when antibiotics are used to treat certain infections. The drug may wipe out 99.9% of the target bacteria, but .1% have or develop resistance to the agent, enabling the .1% to come back even stronger with time. The antibiotic, also, kills the other beneficial bacteria that help the body fight infection naturally, in the same way that chemotherapy kills the patient's immune system (white blood cells and bone marrow), ultimately supporting the underlying conditions making disease recurrence more likely. The reality is that the chemotherapy, even though it has reduced the tumor volume, by increasing the ratio of CSCs to benign daughter cells, has actually made the cancer more malignant. Radiotherapy has also been
shown to increase cancer stem cells in the prostate, ultimately resulting
in cancer recurrence and worsened prognosis.[iii] Cancer stem cells may
also explain why castration therapy often fails in prostate cancer treatment.[iv] Natural compounds have been shown to exhibit three properties which make them suitable alternatives to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy: High margin of safety: Relative
to chemotherapy agents such as 5-fluorouracil natural compounds are two
orders of magnitude safer The primary reason why these substances are not used in conventional treatment is because they are not patentable, nor profitable. Sadly, the criteria for drug selection are not safety, effectiveness, accessibility and affordability. If this were so, natural compounds would form an integral part of the standard of care in modern cancer treatment. Research indicates that the following compounds (along with common dietary sources) have the ability to target CSCs:
People Don’t Die From Cancer!!! People Die Of Chemotherapy And In Terrible Pain! Dr. Hardin B. Jones focused
his studies on the issues related to cancer for more than two decades.
His findings, eventually, brought some shocking conclusion. He once worked
as a professor of medical physics and physiology at the famous Berkeley
College, and spent more than 20 years of his life studying the effects
of chemotherapy in cancer patients and analyzing their life expectancy.
Former Pfizer VP Comes Clean About Drug Industry En zo hebben we hier een heer Pinedo en vele andere specialisten die een handel hebben in jouw ziek zijn! Everybody knows that pharmaceutical dollars are what keep the “science” machine spinning, or at least that’s what former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Peter Rost, M.D., contends in the powerful documentary film One More Girl, which blows the lid on one of the world’s biggest vaccine scams. Author of the book The Whistleblower, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman, Dr. Rost makes the case that universities, health organizations, and other research groups are constantly begging for money in order to keep their operations running. And their biggest donors are drug and vaccine companies, which buy the research results they need to promote their products throughout the health care system. The multinational drug cartels, including those for whom Dr. Rost used to work, routinely award grants to academic institutions and research labs, knowing that these entities will produce favorable “science” in order to keep the cash flowing. It’s an organized racket that keeps pharmaceuticals and vaccines at the forefront of medicine, even when safer, natural alternatives exist. “The way it’s done
is, number one, you give these organizations and institutions grants for
various kinds of research,” claims Dr. Rost in the following video
clip posted to YouTube: Big Pharma spends billions manufacturing fake science in favor of deadly drugs and vaccines The myth surrounding all this flow of cash and procurement of scientific research is that the results are somehow independent, and thus trustworthy. In truth, much of what passes as science today is really nothing more than corporate marketing for the highest drug industry bidders. “If you have a promotional budget at the corporation, they’re probably going to give that money to the universities that do the programs that most support your drug,” says Dr. Rost. “And the ones that don’t, who are critical in any way, shape, or form, they’re not going to get anything. And everybody obviously knows that this is how things work.” “Even if you can officially claim, ‘well, this is arm’s length, we didn’t have anything to do with it, we just gave them a grant, they can do anything they want with it,’ reality is, they’re not going to continue to get money unless they’re saying what you want them to say. They know it, you know it, it’s only maybe the public that doesn’t know it. And that’s how you influence the medical establishment, simply with money.” Journal editors admit that much published science is “untrue” A large percentage of what’s published in the scientific literature these days reflects this industry bias. Former editor-in-chief of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Dr. Marcia Angell, published a paper in 2010 highlighting the fact that, over her more than two decades of service at the journal, she’s now convinced that “much” of the published clinical research simply can’t be trusted as valid. Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the British Lancet journal believes similarly, having stated that up to half of all published science is simply “untrue,” and that science as a whole has “taken a turn towards darkness.” “There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false,” added Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, a professor of disease prevention at Stanford University, in a PLoS One paper entitled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. According to Dr. Ioannidis, research findings are less likely to be true when study samples sizes are too small, when effect sizes are even smaller, and when there are major variances in study designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes. He also points out disparities from “greater financial and other interest and prejudice,” referring to the type of drug industry influence of which Dr. Rost speaks. Ultimately, all this bad science ends up landing on the desks of doctors and other medical practitioners who, believing it to be true, incorporate it into their clinical practices. Little do many of them know that they’re being presented with corporate propaganda, with the pharmaceutical drug lords pulling the purse strings behind the scenes. “It is frightening how many similarities there are between the industry and the mafia,” Dr. Rost once wrote. “The only difference is that all those people in the pharmaceutical industry see themselves as decent citizens.” You can watch the full video clip of Dr. Rost’s interview for the film One More Girl at the following link: Dr. Peter Rost is a former
vice president of Pfizer and a whistleblower of the pharmaceutical industry.
Author of "The Whistleblower, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman,"
Rost is an insider expert on big pharma marketing.
Chemotherapy and how it is a waste of money Dr. Peter Glidden - speaks out about the doctors that use chemotherapy and how it is a waste of money "97% of the time chemotherapy doesn't work, so why do we still do it?"
Adressen Nederland om kanker te bestrijden zonder chemo zonder bestraling
Oncology nurse quits after discovering nutrition heals cancer After 17 years as an oncology nurse, Valerie Warwick took a huge risk and walked away from a lucrative income because she could not be a part of the conventional cancer industry anymore. In our interview, Valerie shares insider information about the industry as well as vital resources and therapies that every cancer patient should consider.
Cancer Is Not A Disease But Business! MEDICAL-BREAKTHROUGH-ANY-TYPE-OF-CANCER-CAN-BE-CURED-IN-JUST-2-6-WEEKS The word called cancer is a lie… You might not believe this but cancer is not a disease; it is a business. Cancer has become widespread; it has affected the old, young, baby and everyone. Sharing this wonderful post will expose many of the hidden hands of the world’s manipulators and annoy them. Do you know that the book “World Without Cancer” has up till now been prevented from being translated into many world languages? Know this: there is no disease called cancer. Cancer consists of only a deficiency of vitamin B17. It is nothing else. Avoid chemotherapy, surgery and or taking medicines with strong side effects. You would recall that in the past, quite a large number of seamen lost their life to a named disease (scurvy); a disease that took the life of numerous people as well. And a number of people got an enormous income from it. Afterwards, it was discovered that scurvy was just a deficiency of vitamin C. That means it wasn’t a disease (illness). Cancer is also just like that! The colonizing world and the enemies of humanity established the cancer industry and made it into a business. from which they earn billions in income. The cancer industry flourished after world war II. To fight cancer, all these delays, details and enormous expenditures are not needed. They only go to line the pockets of colonizers, especially since the cure for the condition was found long ago.
Al lang schrijf ik over de
oplichting bij kanker. Toch blijven mensen bestralen en spuiten wetende
dat hun lichaam vernietigd wordt!
KANKER IS AL 100JAAR TE GENEZEN De relatie tussen Kanker, Suiker en Zuurstof (gebrek) Nobelprijs winnaar Otto Warburg ontdekte dat: Kankercellen eigenlijk nauwelijks zuurstof gebruiken. Verder is de verzuring van het lichaam de belangrijkste manier waarop kanker zich uitbreidt, doordat het zuur de kankercellen een `competitief voordeel geeft bij uitgroei en uitzaaiing. Kankercellen kunnen het goed kunnen vinden in een omgeving zonder zuurstof en met verhoogde anaërobe glycolyse. Bovendien bleek uit labexperimenten ook voor het allereerst dat wanneer de glycolyse in kankercellen wordt geremd, de `kankercellen effectief gedood’ worden met als gevolg `massale celdood’. De speculatie onder experts luidt nu dat de `trek in zoet’ wellicht de Achilleshiel van de ziekte kanker is. Is kanker nu al te genezen met simpelweg uitsluitend voeding? In 1931 ontving Otto Warburg een Nobel Prijs voor Physiology and medicine. De ontdekking waarvoor de prijs werd toegekend betreft wat men heden ten dage noemt ‘intracellulaire verbranding’. Het is een fundamenteel en vitaal proces waarbij substanties die direct worden aangeboden aan de cellen, of daarin worden opgeslagen, worden afgebroken in kleinere simpele elementen met gebruikmaking van zuurstof. Het is door dit proces dat de energie die voor andere essentiële processen wordt vereist van de cellen in een vorm geschikt voor direct gebruik ter beschikking wordt gesteld. MOMENTEEL DOET EEN OUDE, LANG OPGEGEVEN THEORIE OVER KANKER WEEK OPGANG. DAT GEEFT HOOP OP EEN GROOT AANTAL NIET-TOXISCHE BEHANDELINGEN. Naar ons idee bestaat de medische vooruitgang enkel uit vooruitzien naar de toekomst, maar momenteel gonst in de wereld van het onderzoek naar kanker de naam rond van een man die grotendeels in de jaren dertig werkzaam was. Die naam is van Otto Warburg, een Duitse biochemicus die twee keer de Nobelprijsvoor geneeskunde ontving. Bij zijn overlijden in 1970 was zijn baanbrekende theorie over kanker echter in diskrediet geraakt en zo goed als vergeten. Vandaag de dag zijn de wetenschappers echter weer actief aan het terugkijken naar zijn werk en erkennen ze dat het belangrijke inzichten in het proces van kanker bevat. Zou het zo kunnen zijn dat een eenvoudige vooroorlogse hypothese het antwoord biedt op een probleem dat inmiddels duizenden experts op het gebied van kanker, met hun miljarden aan onderzoeksgeld, ontgaan is? De ontdekkingen van Warburg Tegenwoordig bestaat er rond de ziekte kanker een enorme medische industrie, maar toen Otto Warburg zijn theorie over kanker in 1924 voor het eerst naar voren bracht, kwam de aandoening relatief zelden voor. Er was nog nauwelijks onderzoek naar kanker verricht. Toen Warburg, die was opgeleid in natuurkunde én scheikunde, eind dertig was, voerde hij enkele gedetailleerde onderzoeken uit naar de assimilatie van kooldioxide met zuurstof in plant- en diercellen. Hij merkte op dat er bij kankercellen iets vreemds optrad: de zuurstof werd daar niet op dezelfde wijze gebruikt als in normale cellen. Kankercellen, zo ontdekte hij, gebruiken eigenlijk nauwelijks zuurstof. Normale cellen nemen zuurstof op via hun mitochondriën. Dat zijn kleine `energiefabriekjes’ in de cel, die afstammen van bacteriën en zich in de oorspronkelijke eencellige voorouders van planten en dieren vestigden. In deze minuscule organellen wordt zuurstof gebruikt om koolhydraten (glucose) af te breken waarbij energie vrijkomt. Warburg ontdekte echter dat kankercellen de mitochondriën kennelijk passeren en in plaats daarvan hun energie halen uit een proces dat hij `fermentatie’ noemde. Daarbij wordt energie uit glucose gehaald zonder dat er enige zuurstof aan te pas komt. Voor de meeste tijdgenoten van Warburg was deze ontdekking niet meer dan een curiositeit, maar zelf beschouwde hij hem als fundamenteel. Die opvatting heeft hij zijn leven lang volgehouden. `De primaire oorzaak van kanker is de overgang van verbranding van suiker met zuurstof in normale lichaamscellen naar fermentatie van suiker,’ zo vertelde hij zijn collega-wetenschappers enkele jaren voor zijn dood. `Vanuit het oogpunt van de biofysica en de biochemie is er geen groter verschil denkbaar dan dit verschil tussen normale en kankercellen. Zuurstofverbranding is de energiemotor voor alle planten en dieren. In kankercellen wordt hij van die troon afgezet en vervangen door de energievormende reactie van de laagste levensvormen, namelijk de fermentatie van glucose,’ aldus Warburg bij zijn lezing voor de bijeenkomst voor Nobelprijswinnaars in Lindau van 30 juni 1966. Zijn theorie bewees Warburg door middel van `de eenvoudigst denkbare experimentele procedure’. Hij kweekte dierlijke cellen in een reageerbuis en liet ze onder verlaagde zuurstofdruk groeien; na 48 uur waren het kankercellen geworden. Zelfs nadat vervolgens de zuurstofdruk weer normaal was gemaakt, bleven de kunstmatig ontstane kankercellen zich vermenigvuldigen als kankercellen. Als eenmaal het fermentatieproces in elke cel de overhand had, bleek het proces `onomkeerbaar’, aldus Warburg. Destijds werd er fors gedebatteerd over de hypothese van Warburg. Volgens sommigen was hij paradoxaal. Waarom zouden bijvoorbeeld juist kankercellen, waarvan we toch wisten dat ze zich snel vermenigvuldigen en dus een enorme energiebehoefte moesten hebben, afhankelijk worden van anaërobe glycolyse, een proces dat relatief inefficiënt energie oplevert ten opzichte van de efficiëntere respiratoire glucoseverbranding met zuurstof? Het antwoord daarop heeft te maken met de manier waarop kanker in het lichaam voet aan de grond krijgt, aldus Warburg. Het is bekend dat kanker in stand blijft doordat hij zich doelbewust afsluit van de normale lichaamsprocessen (een van de redenen waarom conventionele chemotherapie zo vaak faalt bij solide tumoren). Dat gebeurt omdat de tumor zichzelf moet beschermen tegen de mitochondriën in gezonde cellen, die als primaire taak hebben afwijkende cellen te doden door middel van een proces genaamd `apoptose’ (geprogrammeerde celdood). Om zich te kunnen vermenigvuldigen moet de kanker dus wel een productiesysteem voor energie vinden waarvoor geen zuurstof nodig is. Ook in de jaren dertig was dit al een onorthodoxe theorie. Het zal dankzij zijn Nobelprijzen zijn (die hij kreeg voor zijn werk op andere medische vlakken) dat Warburg niet acuut uit de gratie raakte. In plaats daarvan werd hij geleidelijk naar de zijlijn gezwegen en uiteindelijk vergeten. Het onderzoek naar kanker zette zich voort in de richting van de genetica, die geleidelijk dominant werd onder de theorieën ter verklaring van kanker. Met nieuwe ogen kijken Pas in 2002 deden onderzoekers in het laboratorium van de afdeling Moleculaire Bic’ bic aan de Universiteit van Madrid uitgebreid onderzoek naar de stofwisselingsprocessen die plaatsvinden bij kanker van de lever, nier en dikke darm. Een van hun bevindingen was dat er twee afzonderlijke mechanismen waren die de groei van deze vormen van kanker bevorderden. Beide waren wel gebaseerd op hetzelfde principe, de remming van mitochondriën in de normale cellen. Warburg had nog niet de beschikking over de technologie om die mechanismen te ontdekken en te beschrijven, maar ze vormden de eerste bewijzen van het feit dat hij wel eens gelijk zou kunnen hebben. De Spaanse onderzoekers erkenden al vrij snel dat hun bevindingen een, sterke ondersteuning vormen voor de hypothese van Warburg. Sindsdien heeft datzelfde onderzoeksteam in Madrid soortgelijke mechanismen ontdekt bij long- en borstkanker. Het stokje werd snel opgepakt door andere onderzoekers. Twee radiologen van de Universiteit van Arizona wezen erop dat hun hele branche (de radiologie) al jaren gebruikmaakte van het `Warburgeffect’, namelijk bij de lichaamsscans. Bij de PET scans (positron-emissie tomografie) die in ziekenhuizen gemaakt worden, wordt standaard de glycolyse in tumorcellen gemeten om het `stadium’ van de kanker vast te stellen. Hoe meer anaërobe glycolyse, des te kwaadaardiger (maligne) is de tumor. Verhoogde glucoseafbraak, zo herinnerden ze iedereen, is een `bijna universele eigenschap’ van kanker. Op deze observatie volgde al snel een bevestiging van een team van moleculair biologen van de Universiteit van Texas, dat kankercellen het goed kunnen vinden in een omgeving zonder zuurstof en met verhoogde anaërobe glycolyse. Bovendien bleek uit hun labexperimenten ook voor het allereerst dat wanneer de glycolyse in kankercellen wordt geremd, de `kankercellen effectief gedood’ worden met als gevolg `massale celdood’- Stuart Schreiber, heeft uitvoerig gekeken naar alle stadia die een cel doorloopt van normale cel tot kankercel. Ze richtten zich vooral op de stofwisseling in de cellen en herontdekten exact wat Warburg zeventig jaar tevoren reeds gepostuleerd had. Naarmate een cel meer ontaardt, stapt hij steeds verder over van energieproductie in de mitochondriën op glycolyse daarbuiten en wordt hij geleidelijk dus anaëroob en hypoxisch (zuurstofarm). Bovendien bleek dit proces een genetische component te bevatten, waarmee de theorie van Warburg meteen een plaats in de gangbare wetenschappelijke opvatting over kanker kreeg. `We hebben meer inzicht gekregen in het verband tussen twee modellen voor carcinogenese (het ontstaan van kanker). De ene (de hypothese van Warburg) is gebaseerd op de relatief hogere energieproductie door anaërobe glycolyse in kankercellen … en de andere op kankerveroorzakende genen,’ aldus het onderzoeksrapport. In plaats van dat ze elkaar tegenspreken blijken de twee modellen dus in elkaar te hakend. De hypothese van Warburg ondersteunt ook de minder algemeen geaccepteerde theorie dat er een verband is tussen kanker en zuurgraad. In de alternatieve sector wordt al jaren geadviseerd een basisch dieet in te zetten in de strijd tegen kanker. Het Warburgeffect biedt nu mogelijk een wetenschappelijke uitleg daarvoor, want het belangrijkste bijproduct van anaërobe alycolyse is melkzuur. Volgens de recentste speculaties is het zelfs zo dat de productie van melkzuur de belangrijkste manier is waarop kanker zich uitbreidt, doordat het zuur de kankercellen een `competitief voordeel geeft bij uitgroei en uitzaaiing ‘. Behandelingen op basis van het Warburgeffect Heden ten dage gonst het in de wereld der oncologie van het `Warburgeffect’. Het eenvoudigste aanknopingspunt is dat het verklaart waardoor kankerpatiënten zo vermageren. Dat komt niet alleen doordat hun immuunsysteem zo aangetast is, maar ook doordat anaërobe glycolyse zo’n inefficiënte energieproductie is dat kankercellen veel glucose nodig hebben om te groeien en te vermenigvuldigen. Op deze manier gebruiken ze de voorraad koolhydraten van het lichaam langzaam op. Ooit werd gedacht dat deze honger naar glucose enkel een bijproduct was van de groeiende tumor, maar in het recente onderzoek is herontdekt dat het juist fundamenteel is voor het hele ziekteproces. En nu is het zaak te ontdekken welke onderdelen het proces kunnen blokkeren of zelfs keren. De speculatie onder experts luidt nu dat de `trek in zoet’ wellicht de Achilleshiel van de ziekte kanker is. Stilletjes kunnen we ervan uitgaan dat de farmaceutische industrie al een heel eind gevorderd is binnen de suikertheorie. De hoofdprijs is enorm: het Warburgeffect biedt een unieke manier om kankercellen aan te vallen terwijl gezonde cellen volledig intact blijven. En dat niet vanwege een onbekend genetisch verschil, maar door een fundamenteel basaal verschil in de twee manieren waarop de cellen zorgen voor hun eigen kracht: kankercellen door anaërobe glycolyse en normale cellen door oxidatie (verbranding met zuurstof). Zoals Warburg al stelde kan het verschil niet groter zijn. Bestaan er al behandelingen waarbij gebruikgemaakt wordt van het Warburgeffect? Enigszins veelbelovend zijn al de therapieën met waterstofperoxide en die met ozon. Maar op het gebied van voedingsstoffen, dieet of supplementen blijkt er geen onderzoek te zijn die het verband onderzoekt tussen deze nieuwe ontdekkingen en, bijvoorbeeld, bestaande behandelingen zoals met vitamine C. Het actiefste voedingsonderzoek vindt plaats in het geboorteland van Warburg aan de universiteit van Jena. Daar gaat een team onder leiding van dr. Michael Ristow terug naar de allereerste principes om te kijken of Warburg gelijk had. Zij controleren met name zijn pessimistische aanname dat als kanker eenmaal in gang gezet is, het onomkeerbaar is. De groep van Ristow toont aan dat de Nobelprijswinnaar het wellicht bij het verkeerde eind had. Zij hebben een natuurlijk voorkomend menselijk eiwit onderzocht genaamd `frataxine’, waarvan we weten dat het mitochondriën stimuleert. Ze hebben aangetoond dat kankercellen kunnen worden `gedwongen tot een mitochondriale stofwisseling’ waardoor `de groei van kanker efficiënt kan worden onderdrukt’, aldus Rístow. Zijn ultieme wens is dat er een behandeling van kanker gevonden wordt die geheel op voeding is gebaseerd. Afgelopen zomer verkondigde een Amerikaanse voedingsdeskundige echter dat hij een voedingskundige doorbraak had gevonden op basis van het Warburgeffect waarbij hij gebruikmaakte van essentiële vetzuren. Zijn naam is Brian S. Peskin, directeur van Swing Aerobics Licensing in Houston, Texas. Samen met Amid Habib schreef hij een boek, getiteld The Hidden Storm of Cancers. Het zorgde voor veel ophef in de sector van de alternatieve geneeswijzen. Het idee verkeert nog in een vroeg stadium en voor een bredere acceptatie moet Peskin zijn wetenschappelijke bewijsvoering flink uitbreiden. Momenteel is er veel meer aandacht voor de ontdekkingen die gedaan worden in Edmonton, Canada. Begin dit jaar publiceerden onderzoekers aan de universiteit van Alberta de resultaten van de eerste trial met een geneesmiddel dat specifiek gebruikmaakt van het Warburgeffect. Getest werd de verbinding dichlooracetaat (DCA), die al decennia gebruikt wordt tegen zowel stapeling van melkzuur als zeldzame stoornissen bij kinderen waarbij de mitochondriën in de cel betrokken zijn. DCA stimuleert de mitochondriën zodat ze meer zuurstof innemen om de glucose af te breken. De Canadese onderzoekers besloten het voor het eerst uit te proberen op kankercellen in een laboratoriumonderzoek. Ze kweekten menselijke borst-, hersen- en longkankercellen om ze vervolgens bloot te stellen aan DCA. Binnen vijf minuten begonnen de kankercellen zich al meer te gedragen als normale cellen in de zin dat ze meer zuurstof verbrandden en minder melkzuur produceerden. De onderzoekers geven toe dat ze enorm veel aan Warburg te danken hebben, maar gaan er tegelijk vanuit dat hij het op een punt verkeerd heeft: Kanker is niet onomkeerbaar. Vervolgens gingen ze DCA testen op ratten. De dieren werden geïnjecteerd met virulente kankercellen zodat ze tumoren kregen. Vervolgens kregen enkele geïnjecteerde ratten DCA in hun drinkwater. Binnen enkele weken trad er een groot verschil op. De ratten die met DCA behandeld waren, kregen veel kleinere tumoren (gemiddeld ongeveer 40 procent kleiner) en er waren zelfs tekenen dat er kankercellen gedood waren door normale gezonde cellen van het immuunsysteem. `DCA kan selectief tegen kanker werken, omdat het een fundamenteel proces aanvalt in de ontwikkeling van kanker, dat uniek is voor kankercellen,’ aldus de leider van het onderzoeksteam in Alberta, dr. Evangelos Michelakis. `Wat echt uniek is aan deze stof, is dat hij waarschijnlijk tegen veel verschillende vormen van kanker zal werken. ‘Maar dichlooracetaat is een bijproduct van chloor en dus potentieel giftig. Bij onderzoeken is gebleken dat bij relatief hoge doseringen DCA zelfs kanker kan veroorzaken, althans bij ratten; dus of het bij mensen zo is moet nog blijken. Het goede nieuws is dat het bij de doseringen die reeds gebruikt worden bij celziekten op de kinderleeftijd, geen belangrijke bijwerkingen heeft”. Aangezien het een oudmiddel is en er geen patent op kan worden genomen, is het bovendien niet duur.Dan treedt er echter ook een paradox op. Om een geneesmiddel als zodanig op de markt te brengen zijn er dure klinische trials nodig om te bewijzen dat het werkt. Dat onderzoek wordt vrijwel altijd gefinancierd door farmaceutische bedrijven, maar niet als die geen lucratief patent in het vooruitzicht hebben. Michelakis probeert nu fondsen te werven om klinische trials te financieren. Dat verklaart deels de ophef rond DCA die momenteel speelt. Aarzel niet diep in de buidel te tasten, maar realiseert u zich wel dat nog niet te voorspellen is wat de bevindingen bij mensen zijn. De publicaties van de Albertagroep zijn gebaseerd op trials met minder dan vijftig ratten. De erfenis die Warburg ons heeft nagelaten, verdient meer. Bron: Uit de novemberuitgave (2007) van ‘Wat artsen je niet vertellen’ een artikel van Tony Edwards. Dr. Johanna Budwig is een Duitse wetenschapster die leefde van 1909 tot 2003. Ze was apothekeres en biochemicus. Ze werkte aan het onderzoek van Nobelprijswinnaar Otto Warburg (1883-1970) dat ging over kanker en celademhaling. Volgens Warburg onderscheiden kankercellen zich van normale cellen in hun ontoereikende zuurstofwerking: gewone gezonde cellen veranderen in kankercellen als ze geen zuurstof meer krijgen, dus als ze geen adem kunnen halen. In 1949 slaagt Johanna Budwig er als eerste in om vetten te analyseren en verschillende vetzuren te onderscheiden. Ze ontdekt dat onverzadigde vetzuren in het celmembraan zorgen voor de celademhaling. Het blijkt de ontbrekende schakel te zijn in het onderzoek van Warburg. Ze ontdekt tevens dat vetzuren wateroplosbaar worden in combinatie met eiwitten (zwavelhoudende aminozuren ). Zodra zij dit inziet begint ze met de ontwikkeling van een dieet en voedingsvoorschriften om kanker te genezen. Ze ontwerpt een recept voor een olie-eiwitpapje. Nu is dit recept, in het Nederlands, bekend onder de naam Budwigpapje. Ingrediënten: Neem 150 ml biogarde yoghurt
of (biogarde) kwark, en meng daar doorheen: Bereidingswijze:
Kanker is te genezen Cannabis Bittere Meloen Artemisia annua(Zoete alsem) Deze vier bovenstaande natuurlijke
geneesmiddelen tegen kanker zijn de meest bekende, er zijn er veel meer
die of een genezende werking hebben of een ondersteunende functie vervullen
bij bijvoorbeeld een chemokuur en feit is dat de farmaceutische industrie
haar uiterste best doet bovenstaande zo diep te begraven dat zelfs de
beste archeoloog het niet meer opgediept krijgt en daarbij schuwt deze
industrie geen enkel middel! Op alle fronten ondervinden onderzoekers, artsen die bovenstaande ondersteunen, en ja zelfs alternatieve media sites zoals deze bikkelharde oppositie van de reuzen binnen de farmaceutische industrie, die hierdoor hun inkomsten bedreigt zien want de genoemde middelen zijn niet te patenteren of te exploiteren op de niveau’s die ze gewend zijn van hun eigen chemische troep die niet is gericht op genezing van de kwaal maar op de behandeling ervan zodat een doorlopende stroom van inkomsten verzekerd is en daarmee de bonussen van de top van bedrijven zoals bijvoorbeeld Bayer die gewoon eerlijk toegeeft slechts middelen tegen kanker te ontwikkelen voor rijken: “alstublieft ophouden met deze onzin. Deze stof is al lang bekent en heeft een heel beperkte toepassing als antiparasitair middel. De toepassing bij Kanker staat in een pril begin en is niet erg hoopgevend. Ondertussen proberen charlatans met gemalen boerenkool in flitsende pillen mensen met een vreselijke ziekte valse hoop te geven. Ik ben farmaceut en ik kan het weten. sorry. Kan deze site uit de lucht worden gehaald?” Een kijkje naar het IP en email adres waar deze meneer mee poste gaven al snel de werkelijke identiteit prijs en bleek dat we hier te maken hebben met niemand anders dan Harm J. Knot die inderdaad wetenschapper is/was aan de University of Florida, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Maar hij stelde in zijn reactie dat hij “farmaceut” is en dus zocht ik nog even verder en kwam erachter dat meneer knot tevens topman is binnen een bedrijf wat haar geld verdiend met het verkopen van apparatuur waarmee de farmaceutische industrie haar chemische troepjes onderzoekt en produceert: “Daarnaast is Knot de
Chief Scientific Officer van DMT wereldwijd en vice-president van DMT
in de VS, die Knot heeft opgericht in Atlanta in april 2003. DMT is een
biotech en biotechniek bedrijf dat vasculaire en spieren onderzoeksapparatuur
produceert en verkoopt.” Deze man brult dus heel terecht dat deze site uit de lucht moet want met pieken van 750.000 bezoekers per dag die onze artikelen lezen zijn wij een regelrechte bedreiging voor de industrie waar hij zijn geld in verdiend. Hiermee meen ik te hebben aangetoond dat deze meneer preekt voor eigen portemonnee en derhalve niet serieus te nemen is binnen de context op het betreffende artikel waar hij reageerde. En dit is slechts een van de
voorbeelden ik heb er nog veel meer, waar ik later wellicht nog eens een
artikel aan zal wijden specifiek over dit onderwerp. Hier gaan we echter
verder met dit artikel en nu ik heb laten zien hoe de farmaceutische maffia
te werk gaat , wordt het tijd voor het waarom. Het korte antwoord hierop is simpelweg geld. Kanker levert de farmaceutische maffia namelijk een slordige 124,6 miljard op per jaar! U snapt dat deze corporaties en bijbehorende topmensen(Als je nog van mensen kan spreken) geen enkele interesse hebben om kanker te genezen en 124,6 miljard per jaar naar nul te brengen. Nee, dan is het beter om behandelingen te ontwikkelen die mensen langer in leven houden bij kanker zodat deze winst nog wat meer kan worden opgekrikt. Is het dan verwonderlijk dat wij op World Unity zoveel tegengas krijgen? En is het verwonderlijk dat bovenstaande middelen worden weggezet als hoax ondanks het steeds meer aanzwellende bewijs? Nee in mijn optiek is dat niet vreemd, maar wel onmenselijk. Daarom zeggen wij hier van World Unity: Valse hoop geven? Absoluut niet wij brengen de realistische hoop die de farmaceutische industrie het liefst zo diep mogelijk willen wegstoppen en daar zijn wij trots op. We zullen dan ook doorgaan met het publiceren van nieuws hieromtrent zodra het voor ons beschikbaar komt. U als lezer heeft deze artikelen viraal laten gaan op media bronnen als Facebook en daar zijn wij u zeer erkentelijk voor. Ik hoop dan ook dat u dit zult blijven doen en dan vooral dit artikel wat zowel oplossingen als bewijs en inzichten verschaft in het hoe en waarom. Maak dit wereldkundig en laat zien dat kanker wel degelijk is te genezen!
Waarom wordt ons dit niet verteld? Een drankje dat 10.000 keer sterker is dan Chemotherapie! We blijven chemotherapie toepassen, hoewel er geen noodzaak voor is! Deze drank redt levens en dit is bewezen in honderden studies, maar weinig mensen weten dat de drank zo geweldig is. Mensen kunnen het gewoon niet geloven, waarschijnlijk omdat het een zeer toegankelijke en goedkoop voedsel is, maar het is echt zo. Wist u dat de combinatie van citroen en zuiveringszout sterker dan chemotherapie kan zijn? De combinatie van citroen en zuiveringszout is bewezen een sterker “killer” van kanker te zijn dan chemotherapie, maar liefst 10.000 keer sterker. Waarom vertelde niemand vertelde ons hier iets over? Nou, omdat er geen winst valt te behalen uit gezonde mensen. Ze spenderen niets. Zo simpel is het. Miljarden en miljarden dollars die de farmaceutische industrie krijgt in hun budget zouden niet langer bestaan. Lemon is een bewezen anti-carcinogeen. Op het organisme produceert het een sterk alkalisch milieu waarin cysten en tumoren eenvoudigweg niet kunnen bestaan. Specifiek, cysten en tumoren voeden stoffen die zuur creëren in het lichaam, en zolang het lichaam zuur is, kan een tumor groeien. Maar zodra je stopt met de stroom van de zuurgraad in het lichaam van de tumor, heeft deze geen voedsel en stagneert. Daarom is soda gecombineerd met citroen een uitzonderlijke strijder tegen kanker vanwege het feit dat hun effect heel alkalisch is. Met name het combineren met koffie moet worden vermeden en natuurlijk alle andere bestanddelen van het lichaam die een zure omgeving creëren en het resultaat is zeker gerechtvaardigd. Dit prachtige feit, ontdekt in 1923 door een Duitse wetenschapper genaamd Otto Heinrich Warburg, die voor zijn behandeling voor kanker zelfs de Nobelprijs kreeg, maar toch, mogen de mensen de waarheid niet kennen. Wat werd ontdekt door Dr. Warburg? ‘En als je 35% zuurstof onttrekt, kunnen kankercellen ontstaan in slechts twee dagen. Dus is de oorzaak van kanker vandaag verzuurde organismen en cellen zonder zuurstof.Dr. Warburg ontdekte dat kanker het resultaat is van een anti-fysiologische levensstijl. Anti-Phuspt diëten (met voedsel dat verzurend werkt) en lichamelijke inactiviteit van het lichaam creëren een zure omgeving met weinig zuurstof. De zuurgraad van de cel verdringt de zuurstof uit de cellen en het ontbreken van zuurstof in de cellen leidt tot een zure omgeving. ‘Als je een te hoge zuurgraad hebt, mis je automatisch zuurstof in het lichaam; als je zuurstof ontbreekt, zal uw organisme verzuren. De zure omgeving is een omgeving zonder zuurstof, sprak Dr. Warburg. In zijn werk “Het metabolisme van tumoren,” toonde Dr. Warburg aan dat alle kankerverwekkende vormen aan twee basisvoorwaarden voldeden: De zuurgraad van het bloed en hypoxie (gebrek aan zuurstof). Hij vond dat de tumorcellen anaërobe zijn(ademen geen zuurstof) en kunnen niet overleven in de aanwezigheid van hoge zuurstofconcentraties. Tumorcellen kunnen overleven door de tussenkomst van glucose in de omgeving zonder zuurstof. Daarom is kanker niets anders dan een afweermechanisme, die onze cellen gebruiken om te overleven in een zure omgeving zonder zuurstof. Wat beïnvloedt de verzuring van het lichaam en het optreden van kanker? Het antwoord is heel eenvoudig: voedsel. De meeste mensen tegenwoordig, in tegenstelling tot twintig jaar geleden, eten voedsel dat verzuren van het lichaam bevorderd, zodat het niet verwonderlijk is dat het voorkomen van deze ziekte systematisch is toegenomen. Wat te eten in kleinere hoeveelheden? – Geraffineerde suiker en alle derivaten daarvan. Dit is het ergste, omdat er geen eiwitten, vetten, vitaminen, mineralen in zitten en niet alleen geraffineerde koolhydraten, die schade toebrengen aan de alvleesklier. De pH is 2,1 (erg zuur). – Vlees (alle soorten), dierlijke producten – melk en kaas, room, yoghurt etc. – Geraffineerd zout, geraffineerd bloem en alle derivaten daarvan, zoals pasta, cakes, koekjes en dergelijke. Brood, boter, cafeïne, alcohol, alle industrieel verwerkt en ingeblikt voedsel, die conserveringsmiddelen, kunstmatige kleurstoffen, smaakstoffen, stabilisatoren, etc. bevatten – Antibiotica en in het algemeen alle drugs. Waarvan meer te eten? – Baking soda en citroen – Fruit – Alle rauwe groenten. Sommige zijn zuur van smaak, maar in het lichaam veranderen ze en worden alkalisch. – Amandelen. Deze zijn zeer alkalisch. – Volle granen: de enige alkaliserende graan is gierst. Alle andere granen zijn licht zuur, maar de ideale voeding moet een bepaald percentage van zuurgraad hebben. Alle granen moeten gekookt worden gegeten. – Honing. Heeft een zeer hoge alkaliteit. – Chlorofyl. Groene planten bevatten chlorofyl dat is zeer alkalisch. – Water. Dit is belangrijk voor de productie van zuurstof. Blijf altijd goed gehydrateerd, drink kleine slokjes water gedurende de dag. Wat nog meer – Beweging. Bewegen helpt
om de alkaliniteit van het lichaam vast te houden omdat het zuurstof door
het lichaam pompt. Een sedentaire levensstijl is het vernietigen van het
organisme. Hoewel de industrie meer dan voldoende kennis heeft van de onderzoeken gedaan door wetenschappers, wordt kanker behandeld met chemotherapie. Chemotherapie betekent vaak de dood. Het aanzuren van het lichaam zodanig dat het lichaam de laatste alkalische reserves in het lichaam bereikt om de zuurgraad te neutraliseren door het opofferen van mineralen (calcium, magnesium, kalium) die zijn ingebed in de beenderen, tanden, nagels en haar en als resultaat zien we door chemotherapie de fysieke veranderingen bij patiënten. Chemotherapie verzuurt het lichaam zo veel dat het de verspreiding van kanker bevorderd in plaats celvernietiging. Daarom, als u lijdt aan deze ziekte, begin met het alkaliseren van het lichaam, waarin zuiveringszout dat je kunt kopen in elke winkel zeer behulpzaam is. Het is bekend in de wereld van alternatieve geneeskunde als een zeer goede en effectieve kanker killer, voornamelijk vanwege de alkalische eigenschappen.
Borstkankerscreening is bedrog!
Vrouwen moeten veel beter geïnformeerd
worden. De informatie die ze van de overheid krijgen, is bedrieglijk.
Zo wordt aan vrouwen boven de 50 (die in het screeningsprogramma zitten)
verteld dat in 70% van de gevallen een borstbesparende operatie kan uitgevoerd
worden in plaats van een volledige borstamputatie. Als je je 25 jaar lang laat screenen op borstkanker neemt de kans op sterfte met 0,2% af. Daarbij heb je ook 2% procent kans dat men een tumor vindt, die anders niet ontdekt zou zijn. En 12% kans dat je een biopsie moet laten doen van borstweefsel na een mammografie die vals positief is.
Bovendien is van die 2% tumoren die ontdekt worden, maar 1 op de 3 een kankergezwel waarvan men niet weet of dat het gezwel echt problematisch zal worden. Met andere woorden, er worden dus heel wat vrouwen behandeld met chemotherapie, bestraald enz., die feitelijk perfect gezond zijn.. Screening van prostaatkanker is nog veel problematischer. “Het onderzoek daarnaar is gewoon onethisch, omdat er zoveel schade wordt veroorzaakt”, vindt Bonneux. Er is namelijk – net zoals bij borstkankerscreening – een enorme overbehandeling. Om 1 sterfgeval te voorkomen, moet je 50 mannen behandelen voor prostaatkanker. Maar die behandeling is zeer schadelijk en maakt mannen in grote getale impotent en incontinent.
Don't Want Cancer? Sweat It Off Cancer sucks. No, wait: cancer REALLY sucks. Most of us perceive cancer as a gruesome condition that slowly degrades health and dignity. Though enormous advances in cancer therapy have been made in the last 30 years, the best option remains: just don’t get it. Cancer can be difficult to conceptualize: many common forms (in first-world countries, save lung cancer and cervical cancer) have no clear pathogen. To add confusion, the ones that do, like lung cancer, can still affect non-smokers who make it a point to avoid second-hand smoke. Since you can't really be "exposed" to most cancer, how do you prevent it? (or at least use tools within your control to reduce risk) A few months ago Jordan Rapp asked me to pen an article or two. I've always had a pet interest in exercise physiology, though my training as a scientific apprentice (sounds a lot nicer than "PhD Candidate") is centered on cancer research. So when I was asked to combine the two I started mining the scientific literature. And this is what I found: 1) People who do aerobic exercise
tend to develop less cancer than sedentary individuals In 2009 a group in Great Britain published a meta-analysis of 40 case-controlled studies in peer-reviewed scientific journals (http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v100/n4/abs/6604917a.html) on exercise and cancer. When comparing the most active to the most sedentary individuals across studies, the authors found a 24% overall risk reduction for colon cancer - one of the most common cancer types! Of particular interest was a study in 2009 that followed 2,560 men from eastern Finland and required them to record their daily activities and diet for 17 years! (http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2009/07/28/bjsm.2008.056713.abstract) The authors discovered a "dose dependent effect" whereby greater amounts of exercise associated with a greater risk reduction to dying of cancer. The minimum exercise required to yield a significant reduction? 30 minutes of aerobic exercise daily. I would like to point out that the aforementioned reports are correlation studies. They indicate that people who have at least 4-6 hours of aerobic exercise per week develop less cancer than their couch potato buddies. Exercise could inhibit cancer development, or some other factor (genetic or environmental) could influence both one’s propensity to exercise as well as other habits that might prevent cancer. Why does this matter? Unless there is a mechanism linking the two and establishing causation, exercising more would NOT lessen one's risk for developing cancer. Just because the average ocean temperature and the number of pirate attacks worldwide have both increased in the last 30 years does not mean that the pirates are causing the oceans to warm, and it does not mean that fighting piracy is the same as fighting global warming. So, a correlation has no teeth without causation. If exercise does prevent cancer, there must be a mechanism. I've seen several theories suggesting that exercise modulates cancer development by lowering hormone levels that promote gender-specific cancers (men: testosterone + prostate cancer, women: estrogen + breast cancer). But, that does not account for correlations of decreased risk of gender-neutral cancers like colon cancer (http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v100/n4/abs/6604917a.html). In each body cell (minus red blood cells) our DNA is housed in structures called chromosomes. On the molecular scale, chromosomes look a bit like short pieces of rope that are capped on each end like a dog's chew toy. Those caps are called telomeres, and they tend to get shorter as we age. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21270748) Once they get short enough the rope begins to fray and tangle with other unraveling chromosomes (pieces of DNA), causing random recombination and genetic chaos inside a cell. Many cancers also show evidence of these events, and cancer can be induced in the lab by artificially stimulating these events. So, it has been proposed that cancer development and aging are intrinsically linked. Correlation studies echo this a thousand times over, as I have stressed time and time again in my cancer Q&A blog: Cancer is an age-related disease! (http://ryongraf.com/ask-a-scientist-cancer-for-dummies-public-education-blog/why-are-cancer-rates-rising/) Telomere length is quantifiable. In many scientific circles the telomere length of white blood cells is used as a molecular measure of age (as opposed to a time-based measure of age). It's very interesting that active people tend to lose telomeres more slowly than sedentary individuals. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21102320). Taken literally, endurance athletes age more slowly than the rest of humanity. But could this be due to some gene affecting telomere length and propensity to exercise? In a study in 2008, a group of scientists at King's College in London investigated the telomeres of genetically identical twins that were NOT identical in their athletic habits. What really intrigued me is that the athletic twins consistently had longer telomeres than their sedentary siblings! Clearly, the observed difference cannot be genetic in origin. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18227361) It has been anecdotally said by many that sport is the fountain of youth. On a molecular scale, it might actually be so! Chronologically, identical twins Adam and Brian might both be 30. On the inside, Adam's running habit might keep him younger than Brian's couch habit. It's well established that aerobic exercise greatly reduces one's risk for cardiovascular disease. (http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/107/1/e2.full). Aerobic exercise also appears to have a cancer-suppressing effect as well. The vast majority of Americans will either die of cardiovascular disease or cancer in their lifetimes. Knowing this, it is essential that we bring this preventive therapy to our friends and family that have yet to embrace it. In a purely monetary equation, many groups have postulated that it would be MUCH less expensive to prevent chronic diseases like cancer than to treat it. As a society, would it not make sense to allocate our resources toward measures that promote athletic habits? But I digress… Before I sign off, I'd like to stress that outdoor endurance athletes ARE at greater risk of skin cancers, so keep that sunscreen close! And no, sunscreen does not actually promote cancer development; that's all a big scare based on shaky data and internet fear mongerers who don't actually read scientific literature or understand statistics (http://ryongraf.com/ask-a-scientist-cancer-for-dummies-public-education-blog/can-sunscreen-cause-cancer/). In case it needed any re-iterating, an experimental study in Australia published in January 2011 determined that UV-A protecting sunscreen DOES significantly reduce risk for the nastiest of skin cancers: melanoma (http://ryongraf.com/2011/07/not-taking-it-for-granted-sunscreen-does-prevent-melanoma/). So there you have it: aerobic exercise prevents cancer. And by "prevent" I mean "reduces the risk of developing cancer, or delays the age of disease onset." I realize that I'm preaching to the choir here, so please help me spread cancer awareness (the real kind) and get your friends and family off the couch! Or even better yet, if you hold a position of influence to shape physical education policy in your region, get involved! Hyperthermia therapy Hyperthermia therapy is a type of medical treatment in which body tissue is exposed to slightly higher temperatures to damage and kill cancer cells or to make cancer cells more sensitive to the effects of radiation and certain anti-cancer drugs. Techniques that may bring local tissues to quite high temperatures, such as radio frequency ablation, are not usually what is meant by "hyperthermia."[1] When combined with radiation therapy, it is called thermoradiotherapy. Whole-body hyperthermia has also been found to be helpful for depression.[2] It is also used in the treatment of Lymes disease. Local hyperthermia has shown to be effective when combined with chemotherapy or radiation therapy for cancers such as breast, cervical, prostate, head and neck, melanoma, soft-tissue sarcoma and rectal cancer, among others. Whole-body hyperthermia is generally considered to be a promising experimental cancer treatment, but requires close medical monitoring of the patient, as side effects can be serious. Hyperthermia is considered
the "fourth leg" of cancer treatment. It was historically reserved
for the most severe or recurrent cases of cancer. However, there is more
evidence to support its use as a primary treatment, as is the practice
in parts of Europe, including the Netherlands, Germany, and Austria. Regional
hyperthermia is currently becoming more utilized in the United States
and elsewhere, as devices come to market (e.g. BSD-500, BSD-1000, Celsius42,
EHY-2000plus, EHY-3010 ML, EHY-1020 IL, Sonotherm 1000, ThermoChem HT-1000,
8 Medical Hyperthermia Pump, Beaumont Hyperthermia Pump). Whole body hyperthermia,
using radiant heat chambers (e.g. Iratherm 2000, Enthermics RHS 7500,
Aquatherm, Heckel HT 3000) is almost always used as an adjuvant therapy.
The most effective uses are currently being studied. Circulatory means
of achieving hyperthermia have been elusive, because of adverse events,
but there have been several successful trials. In the United States, Ash
used circulatory whole body hyperthermia to treat AIDS, with several studies
culminating in an efficacy trial in 1997. AIDS work declined with the
advent of modern drug therapy, and this circuit evolved under collaboration
with Zwischenberger and Vertrees and a successful phase I study of whole
body hyperthermia in metastatic lung cancer in 2004. More recently, Locker
published a phase I trial of circulatory WBH for advanced sarcoma in Austria.
Local thermotherapy Local (also local-regional) thermotherapy is a non-surgical and particularly gentle treatment method for cancer, and can produce remarkable success, in our experience. The high increase in the temperature in the malignant cell tissue attacks the tissue in numerous ways. As is generally known, cell tissue shows super-increased metabolic activity (for faster cell division); however, the provision for this through the tumour's own capillaries is poor. This contradiction has fatal consequences for the tumour cells where the area is overheated, particularly if it occurs suddenly. Firstly, the cell-damaging heat cannot be conducted away from the location, and only to a limited degree. Secondly, the increase in temperature causes a lack of oxygen and nutrients in this tissue. Both of these factors undermine the tumour's conditions for life. This undersupply then inhibits the metabolic processes and consequently the division of the degenerate cells. The components are damaged by the heat and cannot be sufficiently repaired. These conditions predispose the cells to dying off. In addition, it has been scientifically proven that a temporary concentration of the body's own defence cells in the capillaries can be found in tissue subject to thermotherapy! http://www.klinik-marinus.com/eng/thermotherapy.html
An old technique back for cure cancer Researchers Demonstrate How Cancer Cells Are Obiterated By Resonant Frequencies A new cancer treatment is using resonant frequencies to shatter various types of cancer cells. In his Tedx Talk, “Shattering Cancer with Resonant Frequencies,” Associate Professor and Director of Music at Skidmore College, Anthony Holland, tells the audience that he has a dream. That dream is to see a future where children no longer have to suffer from the effects of toxic cancer drugs or radiation treatment, and today he and his team believe they have found the answer. Many of us have likely seen or heard of people shattering glass with the sound of their voice. This amazing feat, Holland explains, is due to a phenomenon called resonant frequency. When someone taps a glass, it emits a natural resonant frequency. To induce shattering, a person must match the resonant frequency of the glass with the vibration of their voice, getting louder and louder until the glass finally breaks. Taking this phenomenon into account, Holland and a team of researchers wondered if they could induce the same effect in a living microorganism or cell. They came across the work of a Chinese researcher, Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, who conjectured that live cells exhibit similar properties much like liquid crystals do. With this in mind, Holland and his team wondered if they could affect a cell by sending a specific electric signal, much like we do with LCD technology.
After searching the patent database for a device that could accomplish the latter, they came across a therapeutic device invented by a New Mexico physician by the name of Dr. James Bare. The device uses a plasma antenna that pulses on and off, which, as Holland explains, is important because a constant pulse of electricity would produce too much heat and therefore destroy the cell. For the next 15 months, Holland and his team searched for the exact frequency that would directly shatter a living microorganism. The magic number finally came in the form of two inputs, one high frequency and one low. The high frequency had to be exactly eleven times higher than the low, which in music is known as the 11th harmonic. At this 11th harmonic, micro organisms begin to shatter like crystal glass. After practicing until they got efficient at the procedure, Holland began working with a team of cancer researchers in an attempt to destroy targeted cancer cells. First they looked at pancreatic cancer cells, eventually discovering these cells were specifically vulnerable between 100,000 – 300,000 Hz. Next they moved onto leukemia cells, and were able to shatter the leukemia cells before they could divide. But, as Holland explains in his talk, he needed bigger stats in order to make the treatment a viable option for cancer patients. So what kind of numbers did they produce? In repeated and controlled experiments, the frequencies, known as oscillating pulsed electric field (OPEF) technology, killed an average of 25% to 40% of leukemia cells, going as high as 60% in some cases. Furthermore, the intervention even slowed cancer cell growth rates up to 65%. It was a double whammy. The team also found success attacking ovarian cancer cells. Most recently, they tested the treatment against the deadly super bug MRSA, an organism that is resistant to many common antibiotics. Thousands of people die every year from MRSA, Holland explains, and the drugs normally used against the pathogen are known to have toxic side effects. Incredibly, the frequency therapy eliminated antibiotic resistance, and researchers were able to introduce a small amount of antibiotic to kill the bug. Holland hopes that one day the treatment will override the toxic conventional treatments currently available for patients. At the end of his speech, he describes his vision for the future of cancer clinics: I believe the future of children’s cancer hospitals will be a different place. They will be a place where children gather and make new friends, they probably wont even know they are sick. They’ll draw pictures, colour in their books, and play with their toys, all the while unaware that above them, a beautiful, blue plasma light is emanating healing, pulsing fields, shattering their cancer, painlessly, and non-toxically, one cell at a time. Thank you. It’s also noteworthy to mention tha in 1920 that Royal Rife first identified the human cancer virus using the world’s most powerful microscope. After identifying and isolating the virus, he decided to culture it on salted pork. At the time this was a very good method for culturing a virus. He then took the culture and injected it into 400 rats which as you might expect, created cancer in all 400 rats very quickly. The next step for Rife is where things took an interesting turn. He later found a frequency of electromagnetic energy that would cause the cancer virus to diminish completely when entered into the energy field. The great discovery led Rife to create a device that could be tuned to output the frequency that would destruct the cancer. He was then able to treat the cancer within both rats and patients who were within close proximity of the device.
The Man Who Discovered Cancer Said This….You Will Never Hear This From Your Doctor Dr. Otto H. Warburg won a Nobel Prize for discovering the cause of cancer. There is one aspect of our bodies that is the key to preventing cancer: pH levels. What Dr. Warburg figured out is that when there is a lack of oxygen, cancer cells develop. As Dr. Warburg said, “All normal cells have an absolute requirement for oxygen, but cancerous cells can live without oxygen – a rule without exception. Deprive a cell of 35% of it’s oxygen for 48 hours and it may become cancerous.” Cancer cells therefore cannot live in a highly oxygenated state, like the one that develops when your body’s pH levels are alkaline, and not acidic. Most people’s diets promote the creation of too much acid, which throws our body’s natural pH levels from a slightly alkaline nature to an acidic nature. Maintaining an alkaline pH level can prevent health conditions like cancer, osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and acid reflux. Eating processed foods like refined sugars, refined grains, GMOs, and other unnatural foods can lead to a pH level that supports the development of these conditions, and leads to overall bad health. In fact, most health conditions that are common today stem from a pH level that is too acidic, including parasites, bacteria, and viruses are all attributed to an acidic pH level. There is a natural remedy that
you can use at home that is simple, and readily available. All you need
is 1/3 tablespoon of baking soda, and 2 tablespoons of lemon juice or
apple cider vinegar. Mix the ingredients into 8ounces of cold water, and
stir well. The baking soda will react with the lemon juice or ACV and
begin to fizz. Drink the mixture all at once. The combination will naturally
reduce your pH levels in your body and prevent the conditions associated
with an acidic pH level. Maintaining a healthy pH level will do wonders
for your health, and you will notice the difference after only a few days
of the treatment.
Chemo is dodelijker dan helemaal geen behandeling Als we de harde waarheid onder ogen komen, weten we dat de kanker-industrie inderdaad niet meer is dan dat: een industrie. Amerika is hier al compleet in doorgeslagen, maar ook in Nederland wordt de zorg steeds commerciëler. Dokters (in Nederland nog via omwegen zoals snoepreisjes en betaalde lezingen, maar in de VS al direct), bedrijven die geneesmiddelen produceren, ziekenhuizen en andere grote belanghebbenden verdienen grof geld iedere keer dat een kankerpatiënt begint met het conventionele behandelingsmodel. Dat model bestaat doorgaans uit het injecteren van chemotherapeutische giffen in het lichaam, het belasten met ioniserende radiatie of het verwijderen van lichaamsdelen – of een soort van barbaarse combinatie van deze drie manieren. Het kan misschien hard aankomen voor sommigen, zeker voor diegenen die al geconfronteerd werden met het overlijden van een naaste door de conventionele behandeling van kanker, maar deze behandelingen werken in de meeste gevallen nauwelijks. Nauwelijks bekend wetenschappelijk onderzoek, dat de medisch industriële wereld zorgvuldig verborgen houdt, toont aan dat ongeacht wat de medische industrie vaak beweert, chemotherapie geen effectieve behandeling voor kanker is. Dr. Hardin B. Jones, een gewezen professor van medische fysica en fysiologie aan de universiteit van Californië (Berkeley) kwam na het 25 jaar lang bestuderen van de levensduur van kankerpatiënten tot de conclusie dat, ondanks wat de meeste mensen geloven, chemotherapie niet werkt. Hij was getuige van meerdere kankerpatiënten die door de behandeling met giftige stoffen van chemotherapie op een verschrikkelijke manier aan hun einde kwamen. Waaronder verschillende die veel eerder aan hun fatale einde kwamen dan de patiënten die deze behandelingen niet ondergingen. Na verder onderzoek stelde Dr. Jones vast dat de kankerpatiënten die chemotherapie ondergingen in de meeste gevallen sneller stierven dan diegenen die dit niet deden. Hij bleef graven, en toen onthulde Dr. Jones een feit waarvan de conventionele kankerindustrie absoluut niet wilde dat de wereld dit te weten kwam over hun kip met gouden eieren. “Mensen die de behandeling
weigerden leefden gemiddeld 12 en een half jaar verder,” constateerde
Dr. Jones in zijn studie die werd gepubliceerd in het blad Transactions
of The New York Academy of Sciences. “Diegenen die wel een behandeling
ondergingen, leefden gemiddeld slechts 3 jaar.” Laat dat eens goed tot je doordringen. Wanneer kankerpatiënten behandelingen weigerden en helemaal niets deden, leefden zij meer dan vier keer langer dan hun gewillige lotgenoten. Dit is iets wat je nooit te horen zult krijgen van onze mainstream media. Deze blijven de mythe verspreiden dat kankerpatiënten op een of andere manier chemisch vergif nodig hebben om te kunnen overleven en uiteindelijk “genezen” verklaard te kunnen worden. De studie van dokter Jones toont ook aan dat dit hetzelfde is voor vrouwen met borstkanker. Vrouwen met borstkanker die chemotherapie, bestraling en operaties weigerden – en dus geen behandeling ondergingen – leefden ook gemiddeld vier keer langer dan vrouwen die onder het mes gingen en ermee instemden om vergiftigd te worden met medicijnen. In een studie die gepubliceerd werd in The Journal Clinical Oncology in 2004, wordt er toegegeven dat chemotherapie in feite alleen maar effectief is in 2 procent van de gevallen. Dit is gebaseerd op de standaard vijf jaar overlevingskans rato die technisch gezien niet indicatief is voor het genezingsproces – ondanks dat gezondheidsinstellingen graag beweren dat dat wel zo is. Uit een aparte studie gepubliceerd in The Journal of the American Medical Association uit 1979 blijkt dat veel van de meeste gangbare procedures voor de diagnose en behandeling van borstkanker, bijna al die procedures en behandelingen die vandaag nog steeds gebruikt worden, niets gedaan hebben om de cijfers omtrent borstkanker naar beneden te halen of om de overlevingskansen van borstkankerpatiënten te vergroten. Twee andere studies, eentje uit Israël die werd gepubliceerd in 1978 en eentje uit het Verenigd Koninkrijk dat werd gepubliceerd in The Lancet in 1980, kwamen tot diezelfde bevindingen. “Over het algemeen zijn de overlevingskansen van borstkanker er de laatste tien jaar niet op vooruit gegaan. Ondanks het feit dat er steeds meer uitgebreide chemotherapieën beschikbaar zijn voor het behandelen van uitzaaiingen,” staat er geschreven in de Lancet studie met als titel “Het falen van chemotherapie om overlevingskansen te verlengen in een groep van mensen met uitzaaiingen van borstkanker.” “Bovendien is er geen
verbetering voor het overleven van de eerste uitzaaiing en de overlevingskansen
worden zelfs kleiner bij sommige patiënten die chemotherapie ondergingen.” Afgezien van simpelweg niets doen, wat dus altijd nog beter blijkt te zijn dan met conventionele behandelingen te beginnen, zijn er veel manieren om kanker te behandelen op natuurlijke wijze. Een overvloed aan mogelijkheden om op natuurlijke wijze kanker te behandelen, vind je terug op de website EndAllDisease.com. Een gratis bron van informatie over gezondheid, ziektes, het milieu en veel meer.
http://brekendnieuws.nl/26-07-15-chemo-is-dodelijk.html
MMS Methods for
Life Threatening Using DMSO Regarding life-threatening situations the goal would be to more quickly get MMS circulating in the blood while trying to stay under the nausea barrier. One way to achieve this is by adding DMSO to the activated MMS so that it can act as a carrier for sending MMS directly into the skin and muscles of the body and thus into the blood of the body. Experience and testing has proved that DMSO is carried directly to any cancer in the body and it then penetrates the cells of the cancer. This is not theory, but has been proved through testing. In this case when the DMSO is carrying MMS the theory is that it will carry the MMS into the cancerous cells killing the virus that causes the cell to be cancerous. That part is, of course, theory. However, many cancers have been cured as many people have phoned me so stating that their cancer is gone. WARNING: Do This Test First: In this case, I found by testing that after three minutes of stirring the MMS and the acid as is normal, the DMSO should be added to the mix immediately without further delay. Otherwise much of the power of the MMS is wasted or lost. I suggest stirring the activated MMS with the DMSO for only 15 seconds. Then immediately rub it onto a large area of the body like a leg or arm. This may get as much as 5 times more MMS through the skin and into the blood stream. And of course, using a larger area of the body can also get more MMS into the blood stream. Taking MMS as described below is an accelerated skin treatment technique that pushes MMS into the plasma of the blood in addition to the normal oral doses of MMS. Exact steps follow: 1. Make a dose of MMS by activating 10 drops of MMS with 50 drops of lemon juice or 10% citric acid. Swirl or stir it for several seconds and wait for 3 minutes. 2. Add one teaspoon of DMSO and stir it for about 15 seconds, no longer. 3. Immediately rub it on to a leg or arm or belly. Do not wait any time at all as the solution is quickly losing strength as time passes. For example, a three minute wait would be too long. You can use a plastic sack with your hand inside to rub the solution onto your body, or you can just use a bare hand or hands. If you noticing any burning sensation you can add a teaspoon full of water to the area that is burning and rub it in. Keep that up until there is no more burning sensation. You can rub olive oil and aloe vera juice on the skin after the application. Use a different part of the body each time you apply the MMS/DMSO mixture. 4. Do this once every other hour the first day, and once every hour the second day, and third day, and then quit for 4 days and start the same thing the next week, but never stop taking the MMS by mouth. DMSO is a well-known carrier substance used widely by doctors since 1955 as a way to carry medications directly into the skin. It is available in drugstores in most states, and also on the Internet. Do a search for DMSO.
Het dragen van BH’s oorzaak van borstkanker De antropologen Sydney en Ross Singer en Soma Grismaijer hebben uitgebreid onderzoek gedaan naar het verband tussen bh’s en borstkanker. Zij zijn tot de conclusie gekomen dat de lymfatische vernauwing, veroorzaakt door het dragen van bh’s, voorkomt dat dat toxines en andere afvalstoffen in het lichaam van vrouwen effectief worden opgeruimd. Dit leidt tot een opeenhoping van deze kankerverwekkende stoffen. Bh’s kunnen de circulatiestroom in het lichaam afsnijden waardoor ook andere gezondheidsproblemen kunnen ontstaan, Omdat lymfevaten erg dun zijn, zijn ze gevoelig voor druk en kunnen ze gemakkelijk worden gecomprimeerd. De beide Singers merken op dat het continu dragen van bh’s in de loop van enkele decennia uiteindelijk kan leiden tot het ontwikkelen van borstkanker. Minder zuurstof en minder voedingstoffen worden geleverd aan de cellen terwijl de afvalstoffen niet worden weggespoeld. xrayDit zijn krachtige argumenten en de wetenschap lijkt hen hierin te steunen. Op basis van een onderzoek waarbij vrouwen die een bh dragen worden vergeleken met vrouwen die dat niet doen, is het risico op het ontwikkelen van borstkanker bij de eerste groep vrouwen significant hoger dan bij de tweede groep. Tegelijkertijd zien we dat vrouwen die geen bh dragen ongeveer hetzelfde risico op ontwikkeling van borstkanker hebben als de gemiddelde mens, wat heel laag is. Vrouwen die ook ‘s nachts hun bh aanhouden lopen zelfs drie keer meer risico op het ontwikkelen van borstkanker. Vrouwen die de ontwikkeling van borstkanker willen voorkomen doen er het best aan om hun bh zo weinig mogelijk te dragen, zeker minder dan 12 uur per dag. De afgelopen 20 jaar zijn alléén al in de Verenigde Staten 2 miljoen vrouwen geconfronteerd met borstkanker, wat eenvoudig voorkomen had kunnen worden als ze simpelweg hun bh regelmatig hadden losgemaakt of per dag minder tijd hadden gedragen. No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning “This is an artist’s concept of the metric expansion of space, where space (including hypothetical non-observable portions of the universe) is represented at each time by the circular sections. Note on the left the dramatic expansion (not to scale) occurring in the inflationary epoch, and at the center the expansion acceleration. The scheme is decorated with WMAP images on the left and with the representation of stars at the appropriate level of development.” Credit: NASA Lisa Zyga via Phys.org: (Phys.org) —The universe may have existed forever, according to a new model that applies quantum correction terms to complement Einstein’s theory of general relativity. The model may also account for dark matter and dark energy, resolving multiple problems at once. The widely accepted age of the universe, as estimated by general relativity, is 13.8 billion years. In the beginning, everything in existence is thought to have occupied a single infinitely dense point, or singularity. Only after this point began to expand in a “Big Bang” did the universe officially begin. Although the Big Bang singularity arises directly and unavoidably from the mathematics of general relativity, some scientists see it as problematic because the math can explain only what happened immediately after—not at or before—the singularity. “The Big Bang singularity is the most serious problem of general relativity because the laws of physics appear to break down there,” Ahmed Farag Ali at Benha University and the Zewail City of Science and Technology, both in Egypt, told Phys.org. Ali and coauthor Saurya Das at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, have shown in a paper published in Physics Letters B that the Big Bang singularity can be resolved by their new model in which the universe has no beginning and no end. Old ideas revisited The physicists emphasize that their quantum correction terms are not applied ad hoc in an attempt to specifically eliminate the Big Bang singularity. Their work is based on ideas by the theoretical physicist David Bohm, who is also known for his contributions to the philosophy of physics. Starting in the 1950s, Bohm explored replacing classical geodesics (the shortest path between two points on a curved surface) with quantum trajectories.
Verkeerde voeding mogelijke oorzaak kinderkanker Onderzoekers van de Universiteit Maastricht hebben duidelijke aanwijzingen gevonden dat blootstelling aan kankerverwekkende stoffen in voeding tijdens de zwangerschap het risico op kinderkanker vergroot. Deze relatie was het duidelijks
bij leukemie en met name bij jongens. De bevindingen werden gepubliceerd
in het British Medical Journal. Kanker bij kinderen is zeldzaam, maar wel een van de meest voorkomende doodsoorzaken bij jonge kinderen. Wereldwijd zijn naar schatting 175.000 nieuwe gevallen van kanker bij kinderen van 0-14 jaar, dit aantal stijgt elk jaar licht. Over de mogelijke oorzaken is vooralsnog nog weinig bekend. Een Europees onderzoeksteam onder leiding van Jos Kleinjans, hoogleraar milieugezondheidskunde aan de Universiteit Maastricht, onderzocht de relatie tussen kankerverwekkende stoffen in de voeding van de moeder tijdens de zwangerschap en het risico op het ontstaan van kanker bij kinderen. De wetenschappers onderzochten navelstrengbloedmonsters van 1151 pasgeboren baby's op de aanwezigheid van stoffen waarvan bekend is dat ze kankerverwekkend kunnen zijn zoals dioxinen, dioxineachtige PCB’s, acrylamide, PAK's, acrylamide en nitrosamines. Ook werd gekeken of deze stoffen de placenta kunnen passeren. Deze stoffen werden inderdaad in het navelstrengbloed aangetroffen. De conclusie is dan ook dat de placenta geen bescherming biedt tegen blootstelling aan kankerverwekkende stoffen in voeding en dat de foetus tijdens de zwangerschap blootgesteld wordt aan deze stoffen. Om er achter te komen of deze
blootstelling ook kanker bij kinderen veroorzaakt, werd gekeken naar veranderingen
in de navelstrengbloedmonsters die wijzen op tumorvorming. De onderzoekers
vonden een hogere gevoeligheid voor blootstelling voor kankerverwekkende
stoffen, vooral bij jongens en met name voor leukemie. Dit zou kunnen
verklaren waarom leukemie vaker voorkomt bij jongens dan bij meisjes. De onderzoekers: "Deze onderzoeksresultaten laten zien dat er een relatie bestaat tussen kankerverwekkende stoffen in voeding en het risico op het ontstaan van kanker bij kinderen. Wij hebben echter naar nog maar een beperkt aantal stoffen gekeken. Er is dus nog meer onderzoek nodig." Het is onmogelijk voor zwangere vrouwen om alle kankerverwekkende stoffen weg te laten uit hun voeding, ze kunnen hoogstens bepaalde stoffen waarvan bekend is dat ze kankerverwekkend zijn zoveel mogelijk proberen te vermijden. Bijvoorbeeld door zwarte randjes of zwarte korstjes die ontstaan bij de bereiding van eten te vermijden en gefrituurde producten niet te vaak te eten en vooral niet te lang te frituren. Het belangrijkste advies voor zwangere vrouwen blijft om gevarieerd en gezond te eten en niet te roken en drinken tijdens de zwangerschap.
Een wereld zonder kanker Een fabel een wishful thinking?
We weten ondertussen dat onze medici en door de farmaceutische wereld er alles aan gedaan wordt om ziektes te behouden. Ze beschermen elkaar en ze staan totaal niet open voor soms goedkope alternatieven en zeker niet wat gratis ziektes kan verhelpen. Chemo, bestralingen maar ook de vele super dure kuren blijken steeds meer dat ze juist ziektes bevorderen en aanwakkeren! hun zijn veelal de "aanwakkeraars" van vele menselijke ellende en pijn. Verder zijn er de vele stichtingen en vele "clubjes" die allemaal geld willen zien om kanker te bestrijden. KANKER IS EEN BUISINESS! Wat als ik u vertel dat alle ziektes genezen kunnen worden door u zelf. Ook kunt u in vele gevallen vele ziektes voorkomen. In het verleden heb ik vele malen aangetoond dat welke ziekte dan ook te genezen is. Vele mensen heb ik in het verleden genezen tot dat ik erachter kwam dat ik de mensen daar niet mee hielp. Nu nog komen mensen van de kanker af door zogenaamde wonderen. Deze wonderen zijn simpel het werken in de energie. Dat werken in de energie kan elke persoon zelf doen. Zo ben ik nu bezig met vele mensen te begeleiden om van welke ziekte af te komen. Ja. het is u die van alle ziektes af kan komen gedaan door u zelf en dan heeft u de les van zelfgenezing geleerd. Het is simpel kost nauwelijks geld en is te wereld van de toekomst waar men de gave weer bezit om te werken in de energie. John H Baselmans-Oracle
MRI Shows Cancer Cells Thrive On Processed Sugar Want to improve your health? Change your diet! This message is slowly permeating mainstream society, but has yet to convince fast-food lovers and sugary-treat fanatics. Largely unaware of food consequences, many still dive into high-fat, high-sugar food options without a second thought; but a recent study affirming that Cancer cells grow and thrive on processed sugar may change that. Nature Medicine recently confirmed that processed sugar is one of the primary driving forces behind the growth and spread of cancer tumors. The results were so conclusive, in fact, that future cancer screening may rely on scanning the body for accumulated sugar for signs of the disease. The University College London (UCL) in the U.K. made this discovery after experimenting with a new cancer detection method that involves utilizing a unique form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The scientists sensitized a MRI scanner to look specifically for glucose in the body, and it revealed that cancer tumors – which have been shown to feed off sugar – light up brightly as they contain high amounts of sugar. Explained by a recent UCL announcement, “The new technique, called ‘glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer’ (glucoCEST), is based on the fact that tumors consume much more glucose (a type of sugar) than normal, healthy tissues in order to sustain their growth.” On the update given by the university, it was noted that tumors appear as “bright images” on the scanner. When traditionally scanning for cancer, the use of low-dose radiation injections are used to identify the presence of tumors. This makes sense, as radiation is another known cause of cancer, but such an injection is not optimal due to its potential side effects. However, this method works because the things that trigger and promote cancer to develop and spread can also be used by doctors to detect it inside the body. And sugar can now officially be added to that list. “The method uses an injection of normal sugar and could offer a cheap, safe alternative to existing methods for detecting tumors, which require the injection of radioactive material,” says Dr. Simon Walker-Samuel, lead researcher of the study from the UCL Center for Advanced Biomedical Imaging (CABI). What may be most shocking, as reported by the study’s senior author, is that the amount of sugar in “half a standard sized chocolate bar” is all it takes to effectively identify the presence of tumors using the glucoCEST method. This finding is astounding, as it suggests that even relatively low amounts of sugar have the potential to promote cancer proliferation. UCL is not the first source to connect processed sugar with diseases like cancer. Dr. Robert H. Lustig, M.D. and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Franciasco (UCSF), cites that the bulk of chronic illnesses prevalent today are caused by sugar consumption. Lustig is a famed author of “Sugar: The Bitter Truth”, and speaks openly in videos to describe his findings. The main culprits of deadening sugar include: white sugar and flour, sweetened and processed foods, and fast food. The way these break down in the body (compared to natural sources of fructose from fruit), is that they cause an increase of hormones to be released (specifically insulin), and in effect, signal for cancer cells to feed and continue to grow in size. Dr. Lewis Cantley, head of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) at Harvard University, shared during a CBS interview the sugar-cancer connection: “What we’re beginning to learn is that insulin can cause adverse effects in various tissues, and a particular concern is cancer.” He continued, “If you happen to have a tumor that has insulin receptors on it, then it will get stimulated to take up the glucose that’s in the bloodstream. So rather than going to the fat or to the muscle, the glucose now goes into the tumor, and the tumor uses it to grow.” These sources conclude and relay the importance of choosing wholesome, unprocessed, and predominantly plant-based foods to keep the body healthy, and the mind nourished. Start by adding more greens, vegetables and plant-based proteins, while decreasing the amount of processed foods you consume. The body truly is capable of healing itself, and the necessity to make such changes for it to happen is becoming increasingly evident. http://complete-health-and-happiness.com/mri-shows-cancer-cells-
Turmeric Does what Chemotherapy Can’t: Naturally Blocks Cancer Growth Turmeric is an ancient ayurvedic medicine that has been used for centuries throughout Indonesia and Southeast Asia. It is a powerful anti-inflammatory and antioxidant. Therefore, it can help fight a number of chronic health conditions from heart disease and diabetes to dementia. Turmeric has been found to reduce the cellular inflammation and oxidative stress that causes degenerative disease. It improves blood flow, leading to improved cognitive function and speeds wound healing. Did you know that less than a teaspoon a day of turmeric appears to significantly lower the DNA mutating ability of cancer-causing substances? Researchers at UCLA found that curcumin (the primary component in turmeric) proved these cancer-blocking properties during a study which involved 21 participants suffering from head and neck cancers. The participants were given two chewable curcumin tablets containing 1,000 milligrams of the substance each. After evaluating the results, the lab found that the enzymes in the patients’ mouths responsible for promoting cancer spread and growth were inhibited by the curcumin supplementation. Thus, curcumin intake halted the spread of the malignant cells. A recent study published in the Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, for instance, found that a dose-dependent administration of curcumin effectively activated apoptosis of liver cancer cells, meaning it prompted these harmful cells to die. A study back in 1987 studied the effects of curcumin on the mutagenicity (DNA mutating ability) of several toxins and found that curcumin was an effective antimutagen against several environmental and standard mutagenic and cancer-causing substances. Just remember that to get maximum benefits, it needs to be high quality turmeric or curcumin in such a form that can optimize curcuminoid absorption.Turmeric is fat-soluble, that means it dissolves in fat. Without fat, the active component in turmeric, curcumin, has a hard time making it past the stomach, into the small intestine, and into the blood where it can provide the greatest benefits. Thus, turmeric is traditionally mixed with a healthy fat and heated. You can optimize turmeric absorption with this traditional “Golden Milk” recipe.
We know cancer can be cured
cancer - the forbidden cures
met ned ondertiteling
10,000 times stronger than
Chemo . So, since you know it now you can help a friend in need by letting him know or just drink some sour sop juice yourself as
prevention from time to time.
The next time you have a fruit juice, ask for a sour sop. For more information: http://www.world-of-positive-energy.com/Health/Health_Graviola.htm
Baking Soda – True Enemy of the Pharmaceutical Industry Cancer is an acid i.e. lactic acid, which is a waste product of the fungus and mold and lives in environment that has low concentration of oxygen. If we bring high concentration of oxygen molecules to the cancer cells they will die. Everyone will strongly resist the idea that something so simple and cheap such as sodium bicarbonate (Baking Soda) can surpass the most expensive pharmaceutical drugs. There are compelling evidence that are supporting the multitude of theories that suggest that sodium bicarbonate should be the primary and universal medicament for a wide range of diseases, including diabetes and cancer, also all therapists and medical professionals should include it in the medical treatment. When it comes to sodium bicarbonate, we must say that it is well understood and studied substance. It is widely used for decades, even by oncologists. Sodium bicarbonate must be administered routinely in order to prevent from damaging the kidneys from toxicity of chemotherapy and radiation. Worldwide millions of people consume bicarbonate ions with the drinking water with purpose of prevention or treating of clinical acidosis as well as in a variety of other conditions, in clinics, hospitals or emergency departments. Every day that helps to be saved countless lives. When baking soda is combined with other basic and strong natural substances like iodine and magnesium chloride, we have a trinity of medical super heroes. The problem with acidic pH value ??(relative lack of bicarbonate ions) is a big part of the human physiology. Every biochemical reactions are sensitive to the pH value because the enzymes are very sensitive to this balance. Very important role in maintaining a favorable pH value in our body plays our diet. A large part of the modern diet results in a decrease of the pH value towards acidic. The imbalance of the pH value interferes with cellular activities and functions, especially if the pH value continues to decrease. Very high acidic pH value leads to deterioration of the cells, which at the end leads to serious health problems, such as gastritis, diabetes, osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancer. The fact that biological life has better function in a non-acidic (alkaline) environment clearly supports the usefulness of baking soda. Sodium bicarbonate is responsible for the transport of oxygen: dilates the blood vessels and release the oxygen into the tissue, which means that increases the pH value. Elevated pH value of the urine prevents crystallization in the urinary tract. It has been established that uric acid cause kidney stones, diabetes, heart attack, heart disease, heart attack and gouty. Also it creates a toxic compound named alloxan which is produced by fungi, that means that also creates diabetes and cancer cells. Oral administration of baking soda prevents arthritis, infection, gout, fever, and assist the activity of the pancreas for which is known that produces the most of the bicarbonate and also is responsible for the production of insulin. Regardless of whether someone has neurological or cardiac diseases, cancer or severe form of the flu if sodium bicarbonate is taken together with magnesium chloride is provided the safest and the best treatment. Their common action effectively removes all the toxins and acids from all tissues, cells and organs.
http://www.bestherbalhealth.com/baking-soda-true-enemy-
Inhaling Hydrogen Peroxide for Cancer Fighting Advance Stage 4 Esophageal Cancer, Ron LaSalle, RN BSN MBA CHPCA, Hospice President & CEO, inhales hydrogen peroxide to fight cancer.
He cured his migraines and summarily concentrated on other methods that prove to naturally boost the immune system, this is the real miracle. Nine current and former patients speak passionately about their successful recoveries from the most deadly cancers. Their first-person recovery stories are the greatest testament to the therapy's efficacy. And it is through Dr. Gerson's daughter, Charlotte, that the therapy is still alive in the face of almost insurmountable opposition from the American Medical Association and most major pharmaceutical companies. This film offers a path to a healthier life, in tune with our bodies and environment, not in conflict with them. Your doctor may not advise
you how you can heal your body from degenerative diseases naturally...
but this film can. With every meal, we are either
digging our own graves with the silverware, or ensuring a healthy and
productive life. It also delivers a health-affirming
message that empowers viewers to reclaim autonomy for their own well-being.
https://gerson.org/gerpress/gerson-clinic-mexico/
The Combination
That Saves Lives: Lemon And Baking Soda! There are have been many studies that confirmed the power of baking soda and lemon and how mixing them together may be of great benefit for your body. Did you know that lemon and baking soda may have an effect greater than chemotherapies? A combination of lemon and baking soda is proved to be stronger in the process of killing cancer than chemotherapies, to be precise around 10.000 times stronger! Why is this kept as a secret from us? Well there is no profit if everybody is healthy. The pharmaceutical industry will be losing billions and billions of dollars each year. Lemon is proved to be anti-carcinogen. Also it has strong effect on cysts and tumors. The fact that this tropical fruit may kill cancer especially when its core is rich with terpenes such as d-limonene. D-limonene and related trepenes (organic compounds) in experiments carried on animals have proven that they have great utility in the fight against wide specter of cancers. Lemon and baking soda are alkaline by nature which means that they would normalize the pH value of A recent study established that consuming four or more 150 g portions of this tropic fruit every week decreases the risk of cancer of the colon for 18%, stomach 18%, lips 53% and throat 58%! “Lemon destroys the cells of 12 different types of cancer. It prevents the cells to spread and has 10.000 times stronger effect on drugs such as adriamycin, chemotherapy and other drugs.” Chemotherapy affects the body in the inside and on the outside. This kills everything except cancer. Having this in mind try with this natural therapy which won’t make you sicker and sicker. All you need to do is mix two tbsp of organic lemon with half tbsp baking soda! Not to mention the importance of healthy nutrition and physical activity!
Allan Taylor, 78, beat cancer by changing his diet and taking herbal remedies Did this grandfather, 78, really beat 'incurable' cancer just by changing his diet? Extraordinary story of the man who got 'all-clear' after swapping red meat and dairy products for 10 fruit and veg a day Doctors told Allan Taylor, 78, in April that his cancer couldn't be treated and had spread from his colon to his small intestine In August the retired oil rig engineer from Middlesbrough got another letter - to say he was cancer-free He puts the change down to his new diet, which he adopted after looking up 'colon cancer cures' on the internet
Allan Taylor could have been forgiven for fearing the worst when doctors told him they could do nothing to treat his condition. But the 78-year-old would not give up, and instead searched the internet for an alternative method to fight his cancer. After studying websites, he decided to radically change his diet - and found his condition improved dramatically. Mr Taylor, a retired oil rig engineer from Middlesbrough, replaced red meat and dairy products with 10 portions of raw fruit and veg each day. His diet included powdered grass, curry spices, apricot seeds and selenium tablets. Mr Taylor made the changes after he received a letter on April 30, telling them were was no point having any more chemotherapy as it would not cure him and neither would an operation. 'They said if they cut out the cancer it would just pop up somewhere else,' he told the Sunday Mirror. 'But I was determined to stay positive and decided to find my own cure. 'I was determined to stay positive and decided to find my own cure' 'On August 6 I got a letter from North Tees hospital to say a scan had shown my cancer had gone and "the abnormality is no longer visible". I’m all clear.' Mr Taylor's ordeal began in February last year when he noticed a two-inch lump in his abdomen. He was sent for a scan and told he had colon cancer. Last September he underwent an operation, during which a surgeon removed a nine-inch section of his colon, and he began a three-month course of chemotherapy. But in April this year he was told the cancer had spread to small intestine. Mr Taylor responded by tapping the words 'colon cancer cures' into an internet search engine. He used the information, together with advice from his local health food store, to devise his new diet. He believes that having a teaspoon of powdered barley grass in hot water every morning and night was particularly crucial. 'There is no question in my mind that my diet saved my life,' he said. 'And all it cost was £30 a week.'
A Most Unusual Healer Who Was Acquitted of the “Crime” of Healing Most of us know that healing outside of the medical monopoly is a crime, even as that monopoly rarely does heal. And just about any indigenous herbal approach to healing is considered quackery, fraudulent, or worse by by modern mainstream medical professionals. It’s amazing that one such character was once accused of medical fraud and acquitted by a jury in a Brooklyn, NY court during the late 1980s. That character was a black man from Spanish Honduras in Central America who was advertising he could cure AIDS in Manhattan’s Village Voice. His name was Dr. Sebi. His trial in Brooklyn demanded that he provide one cured patient for each of the 10 diseases he claimed he has cured. Instead of 10 cured patient witnesses, 70 showed up. His trial and its result was recorded in a small New York paper at the time, the New York Amsterdam News. You can read a copy of that newspaper clipping here.
About Dr. Sebi and What He Preaches He was born Alfredo Bowman in small village within the Spanish Honduras in 1933. He never went to school, but managed to travel and meet indigenous native healers in Peru and elsewhere who opened his eyes to the reality of why there’s so much illness among members of the human race during modern times. His cures are with herbs, including cannabis. He insists on a plant based diet designed according to one’s genetic heritage. Plant based is good for most, but not for Eskimos. In other words, one’s genetic disposition varies according to one’s geographical and ancestral heritage. He maintains that for Africans, which he declares he is genetically, a diet based on “starch and blood”, or grains and meats, is not conducive to health. But he also says that different genetic dispositions demand different types of diets. His approach is an alkaline plant based diet. He explains how indigenous
folks did not eat three meals a day, but according to need. In other words,
they didn’t overeat. Thus, he adds, they didn’t produce so much
waste that wasn’t naturally recyclable. Yet he’s quite the character with his expressive mannerisms and eloquent, articulate delivery of the basic principles he advocates to heal humanity. He recommends ignoring the synthetic complexity of chemical medicine and disease. Many of his talks have been recorded on youtube. He is truly a medical and health anarchist who has not been influenced by modern society’s toxic ways. His earlier entry into the USA culture had turned him into diseased mess. That’s when he traveled and discovered his roots for curing in Mexico and Peru, which returned his basic good health. He’s on a mission to share what revitalized him. It’s amazing how he has kept on going with his enterprise of dietary consultations and herbal remedies now based in Los Angeles, California. Amazing because we’re so tied into the gridlock matrix of so-called modern medicine. There should be many of Dr. Sebi’s ilk. He’s in his 80s and still traveling all over North America and giving lectures. Here’s Dr. Sebi’s Cell Food site. I recommend you visit and peruse the “About Us” tab, especially the Dr. Sebi’s Methodology link. I’m not recommending him as your primary physician or even as a go-to herbal source. That’s up to you completely. But here is an interesting glimpse into a man whose journey was tuned into following the truth, and there are some wise gems to glean from him. The video interview below was taken in May of 2104. http://www.realfarmacy.com/unusual-healer-acquitted-crime-healing/ https://youtu.be/jOTV194ztQc
114-Year-Old Man’s Secrets To Live A Long And Healthy Life Bernando LaPallo, an incredible man from Arizona, USA, turned 114 on August 17, 2015, making him one of the oldest living people in the United States, and possibly the world. At this age, Bernando continues to shop for himself, cook, bathe, and shave without any assistance. He walks a mile and a half every day to the park. He has all his hair and his teeth, but he has no wrinkles. “I eat plenty of fresh fruit and green vegetables, and I drink plenty of water. Water is very important. Exercise and sleep. Sleep is very important. Unless I am making a speech someplace, I’m generally in bed by 9:30. I get up at 3:30 or 4 in the morning, go for my walk, take my shower, rub my body down with olive oil, make my breakfast. Stress is a killer, my daddy told me that. It’s important to take time to relax and exercise your brain, such as by doing crossword puzzles. Everything I am telling you my daddy told me to do and I have followed his instructions for over a century,” he told News Watch. Bernando especially recognizes five foods, a secret passed down to him by his father, which he believes is the key to his longevity. Garlic, which helps lower high cholesterol and high blood pressure, prevents atherosclerosis and heart diseases, and has anti-cancer properties; Honey, which is a great source of antioxidants and possesses antibacterial, antifungal, and antiseptic properties; Cinnamon, which helps lower blood sugar, treats yeast infections and inflammation, and helps with digestion; Dark Chocolate, which is full of plant-derived flavanols, antioxidants, anti-inflammatory constituents and helps prevent cardiovascular disease; and Olive oil, which is rich in monounsaturated fats, which keep both your heart and brain healthy, preventing cognitive decline and a risk of cardiovascular diseases. “People ask me what do you do to stay so young. I say, ‘Well you’ve heard the old saying, you are what you eat’,” he told ABC15. And what’s his advice to youngsters? “Keep your colon clean and your liver clean, take care of your eyes and take care of your feet. If you do that you’ll stay healthy. I have done that and continue to do that and that is why I am here today.”
The Seeds Banned by The FDA. Truth From a 40-Year-Long Cover-Up Revealed B17It’s hard to believe, but one of the most reliable, safe, and inexpensive solutions for cancer has not only been marginalized by mainstream oncology, but by the alternative health crowd as well. Some insiders, even those among the well trained medically, decry laetrile or apricot seed effectiveness while fear mongering its supposed toxic elements. So I need to address the toxic issue right away. The natural source of laetrile or B17 found most substantially in apricot seed kernels is legally available as long as it’s not promoted to benefit cancer patients. It has to be a food supplement only. That natural substance source is amygdalin. Unfortunately, many falsely believe this poses a serious cyanide poisoning threat.
Cancer cells contain an enzyme that is not found in healthy cells, beta-glucosidase. This enzyme “unlocks” the amygdalin compound, releasing the deadly toxins within the cancer cell. Only cancer cells metabolize amygdalin. Healthy normal cells don’t. Most non-cancerous cells contain another enzyme, rhodanese. The few free cyanide molecules that may conceivably escape are bound to sulfur molecules by rhodanese, creating harmless cyanates that are eliminated in the urine. Safe enough? Many, many cancer victims have used apricot seeds to cure themselves, consuming 30 and more per day. Here’s an example from “down under” (Australia), quoted from a March 20, 2010 Sydney Morning Herald article by Jill Stark: “Paul Reid should be dead. Diagnosed with a rare, incurable lymphoma, he was given five years, seven tops, by his oncologist.” His cancer curing protocol consisted of consuming 30 apricot kernels per day. Looks like he survived all that cyanide! The article included a photo of a healthy Reid, smiling with a platter full of fresh organic foods at age 68, 13 years after his prognosis. He did adjust his eating habits by eliminating red meat, processed foods, and sugar.
https://youtu.be/sKhzbcpI_ro
There was quite a scandal around B-17 or laetrile at the place where non-pharmaceutical cancer cures get shot down with improper testing or fraudulent reporting, The Memorial Sloane-Kettering (MSK) Cancer Institute in New York City. Laetrile was banned by the FDA during the early 1970s despite its efficacy. One person who refused to go along with the denial and cover-up was Dr. Ralph Moss, who was hired by MSK as a science writer then promoted to head of public affairs. He was MSK’s PR man. But he eventually refused to lie or spin untruths. In his Moss’s own words: Twenty years ago [1974 – this interview took place in 1994] I was hired at Memorial Sloane Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center in New York as the science writer, later promoted to assistant director of public affairs. Shortly after I went to work there I went to visit an elderly Japanese scientist, Kanematsu Sugiura, who astonished me when he told me he was working on Laetrile (B17), at the time it was the most controversial thing in cancer … reputed to be a cure for cancer. We were finding this [laetrile’s efficacy] and yet we in public affairs were told to issue statements to the exact opposite of what we were finding scientifically, and as the years went by I got more wrapped up in this thing and 3 years later I said all this in my own press conference, and was fired the next day, ‘for failing to carry out his most basic job responsibility’ – ie to lie to the public about what goes on in cancer research. Dr Sugiura, never renounced the results of his own studies [proving laetrile halted cancer], despite the fact they put enormous pressure on him to do so. When I was at MSK a lot of very weird things started to happen to me, there was this cognitive distance between what I was told, and was writing about treatment, especially chemotherapy, and what I was seeing with my own eyes. Ernst T. Krebs reportedly tested early laetrile safety by injecting himself. This was back in the 1960s. Dr. Krebs died in 1996 at the age of 85. Apparently were no toxicity reports on the MSK animal studies with leatrile. The lab rats’ conditions were improved from induced cancers by laetrile and they didn’t die from the treatments or develop adverse side effects. So why was laetrile banned? If merely not effective, that’s it, good-by.
It’s logical to assume laetrile or vitamin B-17 tablets were banned because it worked much better than anything Big Pharma could put together, without side effects, and a lot lower expense. That would put a serious dent into the cancer industry’s high profits.
Unbelievable Discovery! This Fruit Kills Cancer Within Several Minutes!
Scientists found that tumors cancer cells can be destroyed with the drug “EVS-46?, which is obtained from the seeds of the fruit of the tree “Australian blushwood”. This type of tree is very rare and grows only in specific areas in northern Australia. Researchers accidentally noticed how wild animals that feed on the fruit immediately spit the seeds. This behavior encouraged their curiosity and they decided to investigate why they do so. The results were shocking!
Avocado Seeds – Super Food for Super Health The Avocado is considered a super food, one that can provide your body with the healthiest nutrients ever, but very few know that the avocado seed is packed with nutrients even more than the flesh or the skin. It also has the most soluble fibers in the world. One avocado seed contains the entire daily fiber dose that our bodies need. It contains more antioxidants than the avocado itself and other vegetables and fruits. But, that’s not all. The Benefits of the Avocado Seed – An amazing fact is that
the flesh and the skin of the avocado contain only 30% of the antioxidants,
while 70% are found in the seed alone. The antioxidants are the ones that
help prevent heart diseases, lowering the cholesterol and prevent different
sorts of illnesses. Do you need additional facts and reasons why you should consume avocado seeds? Here’s some more: – The seed contains another
very important antioxidant which can help fight cancer: flavonol. People
with cancer are urged to consume foods rich in flavonol, thus the avocado
seed is perfect for them. How to Extract the Avocado
Seed
"MORINGA" THE MIRACLE TREE
For more information:
Hoe u alle ziektes de baas kunt worden
Zelfgenezing hier gratis te downloaden
An other great way to leave medicine out your body (migraine) DO YOU SUFFER FROM MIGRAINE? Here’s How To Stop The Pain In 3 Minutes! Only people who suffer from migraine now how terrible and exhausting the pain is. The pain can be so unbearable that can prevent you from doing your duties. The worst case is if the migraine is chronic, because these people are obligate to drink painkillers very often. But instead spending money on these painkillers on which your body can be resistant after some period you should try this alternative medicine and make your own cure.
All you need for this method is: Himalayan salt, lemon juice and a little lemon peel. Make sure that you take high quality salt, the best is Himalayan crystal salt which contains even 84 elements and many minerals. Salt is good for your health since it is proven to increase serotonin – the hormone for happiness and to strengthen your immune system. Preparation: Squeeze juice of two lemons, grate a lemon crust and then add 2 tsp Himalayan salt. Stir this all together and put them in a container together with a glass of water (2dl). After you are done drink it in one gulp since is not much tasty, within few minutes the pain will be reduced or will totally disappear. Be attentive if you suffer from high blood pressure because the salt may increase it more.
23 jaar onderzoek: “Kankerpatiënten die chemotherapie weigeren leven tot vier keer langer” Kankerpatiënten die een behandeling ondergaan sterven eerder dan patiënten die er niets aan laten doen, zo claimde de inmiddels overleden dr. Hardin B. Jones van de Universiteit van Californië in Berkeley. “Mijn studies hebben onomstotelijk aangetoond dat onbehandelde kankerpatiënten tot wel vier keer langer in leven blijven dan individuen die worden behandeld,” zei de prominente kankeronderzoeker. “Mensen die een behandeling weigeren leven gemiddeld nog 12,5 jaar. Mensen die een medische ingreep of ander soort behandeling accepteren, leven gemiddeld nog drie jaar!” “Er is geen twijfel over mogelijk dat het opereren van kankerpatiënten meer kwaad dan goed doet,” zei hij. Over radiotherapie zei hij: “In de meeste gevallen maakt het geen enkel verschil of de machine aanstaat of niet.” Minder operaties en chemotherapie Dr. Jones heeft gedurende zijn carrière 23 jaar lang onderzoek gedaan naar kanker. Hij reisde de hele wereld af op zoek naar gegevens over de slopende ziekte en presenteerde zijn bevindingen aan de American Cancer Society en diverse universiteiten. Dr. Jones pleitte voor minder
operaties en chemotherapie. Hij wees erop dat er vandaag de dag net zoveel
mensen sterven aan kanker als in de 20e eeuw. “Bij kankerpatiënten
die een goede fysieke conditie hebben en hun weerstand verhogen, is de
kans groot dat het lichaam zelf in staat is om kanker te bestrijden,”
legde hij uit. “Het is je reinste onzin dat de ontdekking van kankersymptomen in een vroeg stadium de overlevingskans van een patiënt verhoogt,” aldus dr. Jones. “Er is geen enkele wetenschapper of studie die dat bewezen heeft.” Iemand met borstkanker die zich niet laat behandelen leeft vier keer langer dan een borstkankerpatiënt die zich wel laat behandelen: “Een operatie of chemotherapie verhoogt de levensverwachting van een kankerpatiënt niet, maar datzelfde slachtoffer zal een stuk langer in leven blijven als hij of zij de behandeling weigert.”
90-jarige vrouw weigert chemotherapie. Wat ze wél deed is ontzagwekkend.
Ken je de levenswijsheid: “Als
het leven je citroenen geeft, maak er dan limonade van,” deze uitdrukking
past heel goed in dit verhaal.
|
||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
We
are not responsible for the posts of the members
|
