| AA | AA | |||
|
Zika Freakout | ||||
|
Don't
fight the system. Alle acties komend uit wraak of ego zullen mislukken. Alleen acties vanuit een hart en ziel zullen slagen. In deze blog geef ik mijn zienswijze van de huidige wereld weer. | ||||
| ||||
|
Zika Freakout: The Hoax And The Covert Op Continue Thanks to reporters and researchers Jim Stone, Kathy Ford, the fullerton informer, Jim West, Martin Maloney, and Claus Jensen, who have moved this story forward and exposed the scam. If you want to hide anything on this planet, twist it into a (fake) story about a virus. You’re home free. This is my second article on the Zika-virus scam (article archive here). I’ve been to these rodeos before: HIV, West Nile, Swine Flu, SARS, Ebola. In each case, a virus is blamed for illness and death that actually arises from other causes. The Zika virus, now being blamed for the birth of babies with very small heads and impaired brains, has been around for a long time—late 1940s, early 1950s—and suddenly, without warning or reason, after inducing, at best, mild illness, it’s producing horrendous damage? This is called a clue. A clue that scientific liars are lying. Furthermore, many of the women who are giving birth to deformed babies test negative for the presence of the Zika Virus. So, what is causing babies to be born with very small heads and brain damage? While researching my first book in 1987-8, AIDS INC., I concluded: don’t assume there is only one cause for illness. That can be very misleading. Various factors can combine to produce disease and death. For example, in the
case of this “Zika” phenomenon: Brazil, the center of the “Zika” crisis, uses more pesticides than any nation in the world. Some of these are banned in 22 other countries. And as for babies born with smaller heads, here is a study from Environmental Health Perspectives (July 1, 2011), “Urinary Biomarkers of Prenatal Atrazine Exposure…”: “The presence versus absence of quantifiable levels of [the pesticide]atrazine or a specific atrazine metabolite was associated with fetal growth restriction… and small head circumference… Head circumference was also inversely associated with the presence of the herbicide metolachlor.”(emphasis added) Atrazine and metolachlor
are both used in Brazil. This is a case of suspicious correlation. A study posted in the US National Library of Medicine, “Pertussis in young infants: a severe vaccine-preventable disease,” spells it out: “…in late 2014, the [Brazilian] Ministry of Health announced the introduction of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women in Brazil.” Obviously, pregnant women are the target group; they are giving birth to babies with smaller heads and brain damage, and the recommendation for them to take the vaccine was recent; 2014. Barbara Loe Fisher, of the National Vaccine Information Center, writes: “Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving influenza or Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S and there is almost no data on inflammatory or other biological responses to these vaccines that could affect pregnancy and birth outcomes…The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lists influenza and Tdap vaccines as either Pregnancy Category B or C biologicals which means that adequate testing has not been done in humans to demonstrate safety for pregnant women and it is not known whether the vaccines can cause fetal harm or affect reproduction capacity. The manufacturers of influenza and Tdap vaccines state that human toxicity and fertility studies are inadequate and warn that the influenza and Tdap vaccines should ‘be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.’” (emphasis added) Three: Genetically engineered mosquitoes that have already been released in Brazil to “combat” dengue fever—a project implemented by Oxitec, a company supplied with grant money from Bill Gates: A town in Brazil has reported continuing elevated levels of dengue fever since the GE (genetically engineered) mosquitoes have been introduced to combat that disease. The scientific hypothesis is: the trickster GE bugs (males) will impregnate natural females, but no actual next generation will occur beyond the larval stage. However, this plummeting birth rate in mosquitoes is the only “proof” that the grand experiment is safe. No long-term health studies have been done—this is a mirror of what happened when GMO crops were introduced: no science, just bland assurances. Needless to say, without extensive lab testing, there is no way to tell what toxic elements these GE mosquitoes may actually be harboring, in addition to what researchers claim. That’s a major red flag. Wherever these GE mosquitoes
have been introduced, or are about to be introduced, the human
populations have not been consulted for their permission. It’s
all being done by government and corporate edict. It’s human
experimentation on a grand scale. Reuters, May 19, 2015, “Brazil prosecutors seek $16 million from pesticide makers”: “Brazilian prosecutors said on Monday they would seek at least 50 million reais ($16.6 million) from multinational pesticide manufacturers for alleged safety violations at a collection facility for used pesticide containers… Those manufacturers, prosecutors said, include the Brazilian units of BASF, DuPont, Monsanto, Nufarm, Syngenta, Adama, FMC and Nortox… The charges come as scientists, regulators, public health officials and consumers increasingly complain that Brazil’s ascent as an agricultural powerhouse has led to unsafe and excessive use of pesticides. Reuters reported in April that at least four foreign manufacturers sell pesticides in Brazil that they are not allowed to sell in their home markets.” (emphasis added) How convenient for
these corporate giants to evade blame for horrific birth effects—out
of nowhere a virus is touted as the cause. These are major factors
in all illness and death, in the areas where they are prevalent
(e.g., major parts of Brazil). Suppression of the immune system
is the result, and anything that then comes down the pipeline,
germs or manmade toxic substances, become catastrophic to the
body. The Guardian, January 26, 2015, “Brazil is ‘badly losing’ the battle against Zika virus, says health minister”: Sprays are now being given out to 400,000 pregnant women in Brazil. Naturally, the sprays are toxic. What better way to multiply the attack on mothers and their unborn children? For example, widely used organophosphates in sprays can be highly disruptive to the nervous system. Some or all of these six elements I’ve listed, in combination, form a sustained attack on human life. And as I keep stressing, the virus becomes the formidable cover story that conceals the truth. And don’t forget the Rio Olympic Games, coming up in August. There are multiple scenarios which could play out in front of a global television audience. Will Zika be pushed as some sort of worldwide pandemic? Will a Zika vaccine be magically “discovered” and rushed into production, in time to show (as an advertisement) lines of people dutifully trudging up to receive shots? Every fake epidemic is, in part, designed to create fear and induce blind compliance to medical and government dictates. The germ is positioned as the “tiny terrorist” in this stage play. In my first book, AIDS INC.(1988), I indicated that covert medical ops are the most dangerous, because they appear to be politically neutral, they fly under no flag, and they claim to forward only humanitarian aims. But in fact, modern “Rockefeller Medicine” is built as a vast partner in the Globalization of the planet. Its vision is a universal in-utero-to-cradle-to-grave system for the human race: every human walks a bleak lifelong path of disease-diagnosis after diagnosis, receiving toxic drugs and vaccines at every turn, which weaken his body and mind, and make him unable to consider what is happening outside his perimeter of suffering or resist political totalitarianism. Medical freedom means: the freedom to refuse medical care, and it’s based on knowledge of destructive effects. This freedom must win, against any odds. “Official science” is a contradiction in terms, and a grand illusion.
'Bewijs voor zika-overdracht via seks geleverd in Dallas' Onderzoek naar verschijnselen van zika in Guatemala EPA In Dallas (Texas) heeft iemand het zika-virus opgelopen door seksueel contact met een besmet persoon die onlangs in Venezuela was geweest. Dat meldt de lokale gezondheidsautoriteit DCHHS. Daarmee is volgens de DCHHS bewezen dat het virus seksueel overdraagbaar is. De mug die het virus verspreidt, is nog niet in Texas aangetroffen. Over de geïnfecteerde is uit privacy-overwegingen niets bekendgemaakt. Als het om een zwangere vrouw gaat, bestaat er een risico op afwijkingen bij de baby. Tot nu toe waren er pas twee gevallen bekend waarbij het zika-virus zou zijn overgedragen door seksueel contact. In 2013 was er een anonieme man uit Tahiti die het virus in zijn sperma had. Vijf jaar eerder was een bioloog uit Colorado met zika teruggekomen uit Senegal. Hij zou het virus hebben overdragen aan zijn vrouw. In Engeland werd eerder al gewaarschuwd voor mogelijke seksuele overdraagbaarheid van het virus. Britse mannen die in een land zijn geweest waar het zika-virus heerst, krijgen het advies bij thuiskomst een maand lang condooms te gebruiken.
Pregnant woman getting vaccin When a woman becomes pregnant, naturally, she would want to protect her unborn child above all else. Therefore, when offered a series of vaccinations said to protect her newborn baby against disease in the first few weeks of life, she will probably accept the vaccinations without a moment’s hesitation. However, would she
accept those vaccinations so readily if she knew that her unborn
child was going to be used as part of a vaccine experiment being
conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
and the vaccine manufacturers? According to CDC paperwork, both the Tdap and the Dtap are vaccinations offered to pregnant women during pregnancy, supposedly to protect their newborn infant from contracting pertussis (whooping cough) in the first few weeks of life. However, despite recommending these vaccinations to all pregnant women, the CDC readily admits in their own documentation that neither vaccine has ever been tested during pregnancy for vaccine safety and that they have no idea whether the vaccines could harm a growing fetus. In other words, by recommending these vaccinations to pregnant women, the CDC is fully prepared to use unborn babies as part of a massive vaccine experiment. What is even more worrying is the fact that, in doing this, they are potentially risking the lives of millions of unborn babies. Why would the CDC do this? Health Impact News
decided to investigate this issue more carefully, and what we
uncovered may shock and horrify you. In 2008, as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) the CDC stated the following, at the beginning of the MMWR report, titled Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women and Their Infants – Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): “Available evidence does not address the safety of Tdap for pregnant women, their fetuses, or pregnancy outcomes sufficiently. Available data also do not indicate whether Tdap-induced transplacental maternal antibodies provide early protection against pertussis to infants or interfere with an infant’s immune responses to routinely administered pediatric vaccines.” These few sentences alone indicate that this vaccine is clearly unsafe for pregnant women and that there is no data to suggest that this vaccine can offer early protection. The CDC further supports this perspective by providing the following information in the introduction of their report: “The safety and efficacy of using Tdap in pregnant women has not been demonstrated, and Tdap is not recommended for use in pregnant women in any country. No evidence exists of excess morbidity or any fatality among pregnant women ascribed to pertussis. No evidence exists demonstrating whether
Tdap in pregnant women harms the fetus or increases risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, transplacental antibody induced by Tdap administered during pregnancy will protect infants against pertussis, or Tdap-induced transplacental maternal antibody will have a negative impact on an infant’s protective immune response to later-administered routine pediatric DTaP or to conjugate vaccines containing tetanus toxoid or diphtheria toxoid.” With this information in mind, we need to ask ourselves how, three years later, the Tdap, an untested, non-recommended vaccine can suddenly be recommended as not only safe but necessary by the CDC and offered to all pregnant women to protect their newborn baby from whooping cough. This is especially
worrying when you consider the fact that the vaccine manufacturers
themselves cannot provide any evidence to suggest that this vaccine
is either safe or effective. First, let us study the vaccine information sheets for the two Tdap vaccinations that the CDC recommends for pregnant women, Adacel and Boostrix, both manufactured to protect against tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (whooping cough). Adacel, a Vaccine Manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur In section 8 of the vaccines information leaflet titled Use in Specific Populations, Sanofi Pasteur stated: “8.1 Pregnancy Category C Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Adacel vaccine. It is also not known whether Adacel vaccine can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Adacel vaccine should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.” (own emphasis) In their information sheet, Sanofi Pasteur did reference the fact that they had carried out limited testing on pregnant animals; however, they made it abundantly clear that Adacel had never been tested for vaccine safety in pregnant women and therefore they do not know if the vaccine could harm a human fetus. Interestingly, the manufacturer stated that the Adacel vaccine should only be given to a pregnant mother if it is “clearly needed,” however, what they do not say is what constitutes being “clearly needed.” How can any vaccine, EVER, be “clearly needed” for use with pregnant women? Next, we will look at the information sheet for Boostrix, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline to once again protect us against tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis. Boostrix, a Vaccine Manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Once again, in section 8, titled Use in Specific Populations, the manufacturer has stated: “8.1 Pregnancy Pregnancy Category B A developmental toxicity study has been performed in female rats at a dose approximately 40 times the human dose (on a mL/kg basis) and revealed no evidence of harm to the fetus due to BOOSTRIX. Animal fertility studies have not been conducted with BOOSTRIX. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, BOOSTRIX should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.” (own emphasis) Once again, the manufacturer of Boostrix also mentioned that the vaccine had been tested on pregnant animals. However, GlaxoSmithKline had stated that no adequate or well-controlled studies had been carried out on pregnant women. In other words, they also had no idea if their vaccine would be safe during pregnancy or could cause harm to the growing fetus. GlaxoSmithKline also
stated that this vaccine should only be given to a pregnant woman
if it is clearly needed. Despite having no proof that these vaccinations are safe to give pregnant women, in 2011, the CDC decided to do a complete turnaround. They decided to go ahead and recommend the vaccination anyway. Is the CDC an organization
that cares if these vaccinations have been found to be safe for
use in pregnant women? As we have previously reported here at
Health Impact News, the CDC is the largest vendor purchasing vaccines,
spending over $4 billion annually to purchase vaccines, which
is a serious conflict of interest in overseeing vaccine safety.
(See: CDC’s Purchase of $4 Billion of Vaccines a Conflict
of Interest in Overseeing Vaccine Safety.) In 2011, the CDC began their updated recommendation paper by explaining that the majority of children who are hospitalized and who die from whooping cough are below the age of two months and are therefore too young to be vaccinated. It is for this reason that they feel it is necessary to put another strategy in place. To reassure the public that all is well and that they have checked for vaccine safety, the CDC explained that although they are fully aware that the vaccines have not been tested for safety in pregnancy, they have used the pregnancy registries put in place by the vaccine manufacturers and small studies to collect up-to-date safety data. Again, using the advice given to them by the AICP, the CDC stated: “…, ACIP made recommendations for use of Tdap in unvaccinated pregnant women and updated recommendations on cocooning and special situations.” By making this statement, the CDC has indicated that they agreed with the ACIP and recommended that the Tdap should be offered to pregnant women, for the protection of their unborn babies in the first few weeks of their lives. The CDC continued by stating that: “In pre-licensure evaluations, the safety of administering a booster dose of Tdap to pregnant women was not studied.” However, they then attempted to reassure pregnant women by stating that: “Because information on use of Tdap in pregnant women was lacking, both manufacturers of Tdap established pregnancy registries to collect information and pregnancy outcomes from pregnant women vaccinated with Tdap. Data on the safety of administering Tdap to pregnant women are now available. ACIP reviewed published and unpublished data from VAERS, Sanofi Pasteur (Adacel) and GlaxoSmithKline (Boostrix) pregnancy registries, and small studies. ACIP concluded that available data from these studies did not suggest any elevated frequency or unusual patterns of adverse events in pregnant women who received Tdap and that the few serious adverse events reported were unlikely to have been caused by the vaccine.” (own emphasis) Is the public being
warned by their physicians regarding the risks and unknown safety
of this vaccine being administered to pregnant women? Before any vaccine is marketed as safe and effective, it has to go through a series of clinical trials. These trials are usually carried out in three phrases. Phase 1 includes safety and immunogenicity studies performed in a small number of closely monitored subjects. Phase 2 studies are dose-ranging studies and may enroll hundreds of subjects. Finally, phase 3 trials typically enroll thousands of individuals and provide the critical documentation of effectiveness and important additional safety data required for licensing. This procedure is usually put in place by the FDA. If a vaccine is going to be recommended for use on a particular group of individuals, you would have expected the manufacturers to have carried out extensive testing beforehand, especially on vulnerable individuals like pregnant women and their unborn babies. The vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) and the manufacture’s registries are incapable of providing scientific evidence of vaccine safety. This is because they have no control group (and obviously are non-randomized or blinded) and therefore their data has no validity in establishing a safety record for using the vaccine in pregnant women. We need to ask ourselves,
how a vaccine can be recommended for use in pregnancy if no clinical
trials have been carried out on pregnant women. When you read the CDC 2011 paper carefully, you will notice that they did reference two small studies that they have used to provide evidence of the vaccines’ safety in pregnancy. However, we believe that the numbers of participants were too small to provide substance for their claims. The first study referenced by the CDC was a study titled Maternal immunization with tetanus–diphtheria–pertussis vaccine: effect on maternal and neonatal serum antibody levels, carried out by Stanley A. Gall, MD; John Myers, PhD; and Michael Pichichero, MD. The researchers studied a total of 104 pregnant women and vaccinated 52 of them. Although the researchers stated that there were no adverse reactions, no safety data was provided; therefore, we only have their word for it.
The researchers concluded: “Administering Tdap during pregnancy increases antibody titers against diphtheria and pertussis antigens. Maternal Tdap may prevent neonatal pertussis infection.” (own emphasis) Considering these vaccines are advised for pregnant women to protect newborn infants from contracting pertussis during the first eight weeks of life, this study did not provide any substantial evidence to support the safety or effectiveness of either vaccine. Nor did the study present us with any evidence to support whether or not the vaccine could actually protect newborn infants against the pertussis infection. This is especially worrying, as the researchers have stated that the objective of this study was to determine whether or not offering the Tdap in pregnancy protected newborn infants against pertussis: “We sought to determine whether tetanus– diphtheria– pertussis vaccination (Tdap) in pregnancy provides newborns antibodies against pertussis when compared to mothers who did not receive Tdap.” It is also worth noting that the lead researcher, Stanley A. Gall, M.D., had received grants and research support from two leading vaccine manufacturers, GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of Boostrix, and Merck, where he served as a consultant. The website Protect cme.org states that: “Dr. Stanley Gall has received grants/research support from GlaxoSmithKline and Merck, has served as a consultant for Merck, and has received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline and Merck.” Since the main researcher had conflicts of interest, how can this study be used as evidence? The second of two studies referenced was conducted by Elizabeth A. Talbot, Kristin H. Brown, Kathryn B. Kirkland, Andrew L. Baughman, Scott A. Halperin, and Karen R. Broder, titled The safety of immunizing with tetanus–diphtheria–acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) less than 2 years following previous tetanus vaccination: Experience during a mass vaccination campaign of healthcare personnel during a respirator illness outbreak. Once again, this study
proved less than convincing, as the researchers only vaccinated
a total of 16 pregnant women with the Tdap vaccination, and although
various adverse events were reported throughout the study, these
were shrugged off by the CDC in their report as being unrelated
to the vaccine. About 8 weeks after fecundation an embryo becomes a fetus. It is clear from our investigations that the CDC has decided to recommend a potentially unsafe and ineffective vaccination for use in pregnancy, even though they cannot provide any convincing data to reassure mothers that it cannot harm their growing fetus. Both studies used as evidence by the CDC only tested a small sample group, providing inadequate data to prove vaccine safety. Any adverse events that were reported by the researchers were shrugged off by the CDC and said to be unlikely to have been caused by the vaccine. As the CDC did not present any longitudinal studies to show whether or not this vaccine can cause any long term harm to children, how can parents be confident that it is safe? Acknowledgement: The
assistance of a distinguished Israeli vaccine researcher who prefers
not to be named was greatly appreciated.
Drie baby's overleden na inenting AMSTERDAM - Het Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM) heeft consultatiebureaus opgedragen om een bepaald vaccin buiten gebruik te stellen, nadat in anderhalve week tijd drie baby's overleden die met het middel waren ingeënt. In de tweede helft van oktober stierven drie baby's in de leeftijd van drie tot zes maanden nadat ze tegen zes of zeven infectieziekten waren ingeënt. Volgens de website werden de baby's allen behandeld met spuiten met het pneumokokkenvaccin Prevenar, die afkomstig waren uit dezelfde partij. Het Centrum Infectieziektebestrijding (CIb) van het RIVM heeft de consultatiebureaus dinsdag opdracht gegeven om vaccins uit de betreffende partij niet meer te gebruiken en voorlopig apart te zetten. De vaccins zijn door het hele land verspreid. Dat het RIVM een vaccin 'on hold' laat zetten, komt zelden voor. Opmerkelijk Het RIVM bevestigt de ingreep tegenover NU.nl. Volgens vaccinatiearts Marina Konijn van het Rijksvaccinatieprogramma is het "heel opmerkelijk" dat zo kort achter elkaar drie zuigelingen overlijden na een vaccinatie. "Het is daarom ook heel belangrijk om de zaak goed te onderzoeken." Het zal vermoedelijk enkele weken duren voordat dat onderzoek tot resultaat leidt. Ze laat weten dat jaarlijks
vijf tot tien jonge kinderen sterven na een inenting. Een verband
is echter niet aangetoond. Meestal gaat het volgens het RIVM om
toeval: baby's krijgen in hun eerste levensjaar meermalen vaccinaties,
en kunnen door allerlei redenen overlijden. Volgens de woordvoerster zijn vaccins uit de betreffende partij in de afgelopen maanden "tienduizenden keren" in binnen- en buitenland gebruikt zonder dat dat tot problemen leidde. Ook een van de overleden baby's was al eerder met het vaccin behandeld. De betreffende partij wordt uit voorzorg voorlopig niet gebruikt. Inmiddels zijn consultatiebureaus voorzien van nieuwe vaccins. Het pneumokokkenvaccin beschermt baby's tegen een aantal gevaarlijke infecties, zoals hersenvliesontsteking of middenoorontsteking. Die aandoeningen kunnen leiden tot ernstige bloedvergiftiging. Sinds 2006 is de inenting opgenomen in het vaccinatieprogramma.
Tdap Vaccinations for All Pregnant Women in Brazil Mandated in Late 2014 “[Brazil] will recommend Tdap in the routine immunization programme for pregnant women from 2014 onward.” — World Health Organization In October 2014, the Brazilian Ministry of Health’s Epidemiological Surveillance Center “Prof. Alexandre Vranjac” (CVE) in São Paulo, Brazil published a “technical report” on the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine (Tdap).1 In that report, the CVE stated that the Tdap vaccine would be included in Brazil’s National Vaccination Schedule for pregnant women. Considering the epidemiological situation of the [pertussis] disease and the need to protect the mother-child pair, the Tdap vaccine will be incorporated into the National Vaccination Schedule for pregnant women and health professionals (anesthesiologist, gynecologist, obstetrician, neonatologist, pediatrician, nurse, and nursing technician) who care for newborns in maternity wards and nurseries/neonatal ICUs.1 A retrospective study published in the journal BMC Infectious Diseases in 2015 highlights the growing incidence of pertussis (whooping cough) in Brazil from 2007 to 2014. Using data obtained from case notification forms, the study identified a total of 80,068 “suspected cases” of pertussis in Brazil during that seven-year period.2 Another study published in Autopsy Case Reports last year cited the increasing number of deaths from pertussis in Brazil in recent years, particularly in 2013.3 In 2013, 109 pertussis-related deaths were reported—a number 7-fold higher than the average number of deaths reported annually in the period from 2001 to 2010. More than 80% of the deaths occurred in infants younger than 3 months of age.3 It is understandable that the Brazilian government was concerned about the upward trend in pertussis infections. By the end of 2014, following the October report from the CVE, the Brazilian Ministry of Health announced the introduction of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women in the country,3 and the Brazilian National Immunization Program (NIP) had begun the vaccinations.2 (In 2011, with little evidence proving safety, the CDC instituted a similar universal use Tdap vaccine policy for all pregnant women in the U.S. in an attempt to control pertussis infections)4 The policy change to vaccinating pregnant women with Tdap to try to control pertussis infections in Brazil had been expected for many months. Earlier in 2014, at a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE), the group had written in a background paper… [Brazil] will recommend Tdap in the routine immunization programme for pregnant women from 2014 onward.5 . The CVE report recommended the Tdap vaccine be given to women between the 27th week and 36th week of their pregnancy, and that it could also be administered up to 20 days prior to the expected date of birth.1 The report specified the Tdap produced by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) of the United Kingdom as the one to be used. GSK has a technology transfer agreement with Brazil’s Butantan Institute for the production of the Tdap vaccine6 in Brazil. The CVE report listed the following ingredients in the GSK/Butantan Institute Tdap vaccine: Diphtheria toxoid—not
less than 2 International Units (IU) GSK’s Tdap product is internationally known under the brand name Refortrix® or, more commonly, Boostrix®), and it has been licensed in Brazil for more than a decade.7 In addition to the ingredients listed above for Boostrix, the following growth medium and process ingredients are used in manufacturing the vaccine: modified Latham medium
derived from bovine casein According to GSK, neither the safety nor effectiveness of Boostrix have been established in pregnant women.8 The package insert for Boostrix reads: A developmental toxicity study has been performed in female rats at a dose approximately 40 times the human dose (on a mL/kg basis) and revealed no evidence of harm to the fetus due to BOOSTRIX. Animal fertility studies have not been conducted with BOOSTRIX. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, BOOSTRIX should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.9 Despite this cautionary information, the Brazilian government has been vaccinating tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of pregnant women in its country during the past year. A large portion of these pregnancies are occurring in Brazil’s northeastern region, notably in the state of Pernambuco—the country’s fastest growing population center.10 11
... disastrous unintended consequences now threaten life across the Americas
GMO skeptics like myself have been warning for years of the unintended consequences of genetic pollution. Even when genetically engineered organisms are released into the world with the best of intentions, such actions can wreak havoc on the ecosystem and human civilization in ways that simply can't be foreseen by the world's most well-meaning scientists. I specifically warned about this in 2012, listing the top 12 threats to humanity posed by out of control science. In that infographic, I designated "Level 4" hazards as "Self-replicating pollution," naming genetically engineered organisms as the vector for such threats against humanity. (In the years since, many top science figures like Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk have repeated the warnings from my list, including threats from AI.) Now we may be seeing the first wave of the horrific destruction that can be unleashed by self-replicating genetically modified organisms. The Zika virus, now spreading with unbridled ferocity, appears to have been caused by the release of genetically engineered mosquitoes that scientists hoped would sharply reduce malaria infections. "The Zika virus outbreak currently gripping the Americas could have been sparked by the release of genetically modified mosquitoes in 2012," reports The Mirror. "The insects were engineered by biotechnology experts to combat the spread of dengue fever and other diseases and released into the general population of Brazil in 2012... The Aedes aegypti mosquito sub-species that carries both the Zika virus and dengue was the type targeted with genetically modified mosquitoes." But something went horribly wrong. As pointed out in this fantastic article by AntiMedia.org, the genetic engineers running this massive open-air experiment with mosquitoes and humans failed to consider the impact of antibiotics in the environment caused by their heavy use in agricultural (animal feed) operations. As AntiMedia reports: Only the male modified Aedes mosquitoes are supposed to be released into the wild — as they will mate with their unaltered female counterparts. Once offspring are produced, the modified, scientific facet is supposed to ‘kick in’ and kill that larvae before it reaches breeding age — if tetracycline is not present during its development... According to an unclassified document from the Trade and Agriculture Directorate Committee for Agriculture dated February 2015, Brazil is the third largest in “global antimicrobial consumption in food animal production” — meaning, Brazil is third in the world for its use of tetracycline in its food animals. As a study by the American Society of Agronomy, et. al., explained, “It is estimated that approximately 75% of antibiotics are not absorbed by animals and are excreted in waste.” One of the antibiotics (or antimicrobials) specifically named in that report for its environmental persistence is tetracycline. The presence of antibiotics causes the mosquitoes that are supposed to die off to survive and reproduce. These same genetically engineered mosquitoes may then bite humans, injecting them with the Zika virus that's now causing horrific mutations in head and brain formation in children. A whole new epidemic
caused by foolish genetic engineering that alters entire ecosystems As more reports of deformed children keep appearing, the media is freaking out, the CDC is freaking out and the U.S. government is freaking out, demanding urgent calls for yet more vaccines. Alarmingly, the very same scientists who pushed for the release of the genetically engineered mosquitoes that may have caused all this are also now calling for more genetically engineered mosquitoes which they claim will solve this problem. But the incompetence and corruption of government and science has never been more blatant: None of the testing with GMO mosquitoes took place in the presence of tetracycline or other antibiotics that are now ubiquitous in the environment due to heavy use of drugs in factory farm operations. Mother Nature is not
obedient to the hazardous science of foolish biotechnology This is why GMOs are such an enormous threat to human civilization, and it's why life-hating media outlets like Forbes.com and Wikipedia are so dangerous in their spewing of biotech industry propaganda (pushed by paid biotech industry shills like Henry Miller, Jon Entine, Keith Kloor and Kevin Folta). See the full list of so-called "Monsanto Mafia" members (including paid prostitute journalists like Amy Harmon and Tamar Haspel) at MonsantoMafia.com. Here's the kind of suffering humanity is now going to increasingly witness across our world as more genetically engineered organisms destroy ecosystems and cause humans to be infected with deadly viruses:
The Zika virus may be just the beginning. GMOs and their related chemicals are right now devastating honeybee populations, destroying soil microbiology, polluting rivers and oceans, and contaminating the food supply with cancer-causing glyphosate herbicide, a chemical that can cause cancer at parts-per-trillion concentrations. Two years ago, the EPA quietly raised the limit of glyphosate allowable in food crops, selling out the public by doing the bidding of Monsanto and other biotech firms. The result is that eating cancer-causing poison is now considered "safe" by the EPA -- the same incompetent, corrupt government regulator that knowingly allowed the children of Flint, Michigan, to drink lead water, month after month, without warning the public. GMOs and the EPA /
FDA / USDA... a whole new kind of war on humanity See Group of scientists gave standing ovation for plan to kill 90 percent of human population with airborne Ebola for yet another example of how "scientists" are thrilled at the idea of using viruses and airborne delivery (via mosquitoes or otherwise) to commit mass genocide against humanity. This is the kind of thing they dream about unleashing in their war against a population problem that they think will end the world if they don't drastically reduce the number of people living on our planet. The Zika virus, in other words, might not even be an accident. If you give these scientists the most optimistic credit possible, you might say they intended for a positive outcome but didn't realize the risks of what they were doing. But a more pessimistic analysis of their actions might reasonably conclude that they're testing a bioweapon delivery system against humanity. Only time will tell which interpretation is correct. Whatever the outcome, make no mistake that today's biotech science is incredibly foolish, and the actions of these biotech corporations are putting the very future of humanity at extreme risk. Now, it seems, humanity is beginning to witness the true cost of arrogantly playing God with nature. Sources for this article
include
Zika Outbreak Epicenter in Same Area Where GM Mosquitoes Were Released in 2015 (ANTIMEDIA) United States — The World Health Organization announced it will convene an Emergency Committee under International Health Regulations on Monday, February 1, concerning the Zika virus ‘explosive’ spread throughout the Americas. The virus reportedly has the potential to reach pandemic proportions — possibly around the globe. But understandingwhy this outbreak happened is vital to curbing it. As the WHO statement said: “A causal relationship between Zika virus infection and birth malformations and neurological syndromes … is strongly suspected. [These links] have rapidly changed the risk profile of Zika, from a mild threat to one of alarming proportions. “WHO is deeply concerned about this rapidly evolving situation for 4 main reasons: the possible association of infection with birth malformations and neurological syndromes; the potential for further international spread given the wide geographical distribution of the mosquito vector; the lack of population immunity in newly affected areas; and the absence of vaccines, specific treatments, and rapid diagnostic tests […]
“The level of concern is high, as is the level of uncertainty.” Zika seemingly exploded out of nowhere. Though it was first discovered in 1947, cases only sporadically occurred throughout Africa and southern Asia. In 2007, the first case was reported in the Pacific. In 2013, a smattering of small outbreaks and individual cases were officially documented in Africa and the western Pacific. They also began showing up in the Americas. In May 2015, Brazil reported its first case of Zika virus — and the situation changed dramatically. Brazil is now considered the epicenter of the Zika outbreak, which coincides with at least 4,000 reports of babies born with microcephaly just since October. zika-microcephalyWhen examining a rapidly expanding potential pandemic, it’s necessary to leave no stone unturned so possible solutions, as well as future prevention, will be as effective as possible. In that vein, there was another significant development in 2015. Oxitec first unveiled its large-scale, genetically-modified mosquito farm in Brazil in July 2012, with the goal of reducing “the incidence of dengue fever,” as The Disease Daily reported. Dengue fever is spread by the same Aedes mosquitoes which spread the Zika virus — and though they “cannot fly more than 400 meters,” WHO stated, “it may inadvertently be transported by humans from one place to another.” By July 2015, shortly after the GM mosquitoes were first released into the wild in Juazeiro, Brazil, Oxitec proudly announced they had “successfully controlled the Aedes aegypti mosquito that spreads dengue fever, chikungunya and zika virus, by reducing the target population by more than 90%.” Though that might sound like an astounding success — and, arguably, it was — there is an alarming possibility to consider. Nature, as one Redditor keenly pointed out, finds a way — and the effort to control dengue, zika, and other viruses, appears to have backfired dramatically.
Those genetically-modified mosquitoes work to control wild, potentially disease-carrying populations in a very specific manner. Only the male modified Aedes mosquitoes are supposed to be released into the wild — as they will mate with their unaltered female counterparts. Once offspring are produced, the modified, scientific facet is supposed to ‘kick in’ and kill that larvae before it reaches breeding age — if tetracycline is not present during its development. But there is a problem.
According to an unclassified document from the Trade and Agriculture Directorate Committee for Agriculture dated February 2015, Brazil is the third largest in “global antimicrobial consumption in food animal production” — meaning, Brazil is third in the world for its use of tetracycline in its food animals. As a study by the American Society of Agronomy, et. al., explained, “It is estimated that approximately 75% of antibiotics are not absorbed by animals and are excreted in waste.” One of the antibiotics (or antimicrobials) specifically named in that report for its environmental persistence is tetracycline. In fact, as a confidential internal Oxitec document divulged in 2012, that survival rate could be as high as 15% — even with low levels of tetracycline present. “Even small amounts of tetracycline can repress” the engineered lethality. Indeed, that 15% survival rate was described by Oxitec: “After a lot of testing and comparing experimental design, it was found that [researchers] had used a cat food to feed the [OX513A] larvae and this cat food contained chicken. It is known that tetracycline is routinely used to prevent infections in chickens, especially in the cheap, mass produced, chicken used for animal food. The chicken is heat-treated before being used, but this does not remove all the tetracycline. This meant that a small amount of tetracycline was being added from the food to the larvae and repressing the [designed] lethal system.” Even absent this tetracycline, as Steinbrecher explained, a “sub-population” of genetically-modified Aedes mosquitoes could theoretically develop and thrive, in theory, “capable of surviving and flourishing despite any further” releases of ‘pure’ GM mosquitoes which still have that gene intact. She added, “the effectiveness of the system also depends on the [genetically-designed] late onset of the lethality. If the time of onset is altered due to environmental conditions … then a 3-4% [survival rate] represents a much bigger problem…” As the WHO stated in its press release, “conditions associated with this year’s El Nino weather pattern are expected to increase mosquito populations greatly in many areas.” Incidentally, President Obama called for a massive research effort to develop a vaccine for the Zika virus, as one does not currently exist. Brazil has now called in 200,000 soldiers to somehow help combat the virus’ spread. Aedes mosquitoes have reportedly been spotted in the U.K. But perhaps the most ironic — or not — proposition was proffered on January 19, by the MIT Technology Review: “An outbreak in the Western Hemisphere could give countries including the United States new reasons to try wiping out mosquitoes with genetic engineering. “Yesterday, the Brazilian city of Piracicaba said it would expand the use of genetically modified mosquitoes … “The GM mosquitoes were created by Oxitec, a British company recently purchased by Intrexon, a synthetic biology company based in Maryland. The company said it has released bugs in parts of Brazil and the Cayman Islands to battle dengue fever.”
Het Zika Virus online te koop
THERE IS AN ERROR IN THE VACCINE/SHRUNKEN BABY BRAIN REPORT THAT MUST BE FIXED.
I have top posted the
Tdap vaccine scam so people who were on vacation when this first
went up can find it. They are now fronting
brain damage caused by a newly formulated Tdap vaccine as a "Zika
virus outbreak". Problem: The Zika virus, which has been
known about for 70 years, has never done anything to babies while
the mother was pregnant. Zika results in a mild cold and is all
over the world now doing nothing to anyone with a mortality rate
of ZERO. QUESTION: why did it suddenly blow the brains out of
thousands of babies in ONE LOCATION - Brazil in the past two months
alone when ZERO reported cases of this outcome have ever been
recorded prior? ANSWER: Because a new Tdap vaccine, which was
spawned to destroy babies before they were born rather than after
birth (due to the new awareness that autism is caused by intentionally
destructive vaccines) was launched in Brazil in May of 2015. Gates&Cohorts
now need a scapegoat to pin the damage on, and "ZIKA"
sounded spooky enough. This "shrunken brain" issue in newborns was just suddenly in Brazil as if someone flipped a switch, and the only way that could really happen is via the sudden arrival of a new brain destroying Tdap vaccine, which all pregnant Latin American women are strongly encouraged to get before week 22 of pregnancy. This sudden occurrence of shrunken brains perfectly matches the probable arrival of the real culprit - a tainted Tdap vaccine, which if administered in May (when this virus supposedly arrived) would be causing precisely the shrunken newborn baby brain problems Brazilians are having now, right on schedule. The claim is that a mosquito naturally carried this disease across almost all of South and Central America in only six months. This defies all logic because mosquitoes have a life cycle that is too long for immediate propagation and won't fly more than a mile from where they hatch, which would limit the movement of a totally new disease to a mile or so a month, not 30 miles a day. A continent wide outbreak of a totally new virus is not the same thing as an outbreak of malaria, which is already everywhere and only needs the correct conditions to bring it forward. As standing proof of the impossibility any totally new host/carrier/host dependent disease could naturally propagate so rapidly, just look at how long it took the killer bee which needs no intermediate host to propagate through south and central America. It took the killer bee decades to do so and bees can fly miles in a day. And the killer bee was not host dependent, which in the case of the Zika virus, which is host dependent might permanently quarantine such a virus to a small area via demography alone. Additionally, if the zika virus spread so readily, it should have made it to Brazil from Africa during the first periods of air traffic 50 years ago, traveling to Brazil via infected passengers, who would then pass it along to the Brazilian mosquitoes. If it was as contagious as they claim, and it really did shrink baby brains, it should have been decades old news. ADDITIONALLY, AND EVEN
MORE IMPORTANT IS THAT SOME OF THE NEWS RELEASES RELATED TO THIS
"DISEASE" WERE ORIGINALLY DATED WEEKS INTO THE FUTURE,
WHICH MEANS SOMEONE IS DOING IT AND THE MEDIA RELEASE WAS PRE
PLANNED, TO MAKE THE SPREAD OF THE DISEASE APPEAR TO SPAN MORE
THAN A YEAR, WHEN IT HAS NOT. Here is the wiki: "The emergence of Zika virus in South America led to a rapid spread throughout South and Central America, reaching Mexico in November 2015" My response: Yep, it
is in Wikipedia, which anyone can write to, including those involved
in this plot, and they can just make it all look normal. Yep,
symbiotic host/carrier/host diseases just rip across continents
to all corners in months, faster than a bush tribesman could travel!
IT REALLY IS THAT WAY, Wikipedia said so! Here is another wiki
quote: By using phylogenetic analysis of Asian strains it was estimated that Zika virus had moved to Southeast Asia by 1945.[2] In 1977 - 1978 Zika virus infection was described as a cause of fever in Indonesia.[5] The first major outbreak, with 185 confirmed cases, was reported in 2007 in the Yap Islands of the Federated States of Micronesia.[6] A total of 108 cases were confirmed by PCR or serology and 72 additional cases were suspected. The most common symptoms were rash, fever, arthralgia and conjunctivitis, and no deaths were reported. The mosquito Aedes hensilli, which was the predominant species identified in Yap during the outbreak, was probably the main vector of transmission. While the way of introduction of the virus on Yap Island remains uncertain, it is likely to have happened through introduction of infected mosquitoes or a viraemic human with a strain related to those in Southeast Asia.[2][6] This was also the first time Zika fever had been reported outside Africa and Asia.[7]" My response: ALL OF
THAT, AND IT WAS NEVER ASSOCIATED WITH SHRUNKEN BABY BRAINS UNTIL
IT HIT BRAZIL, WHERE IT JUST SUDDENLY WHACKED THE BABY BRAINS
OUT OF 2400 PREGNANT MOMS! See what I am getting at here? And
if they change things, and say this disease has a history of shrinking
baby brains, remember, up until now IT WAS NOT SO, so something
else is causing the brain destroyed babies, it is not any "zika
disease", something else is causing it and I guess they figured
"zika" sounded spooky enough to blame it all on while
they proceed to blow baby brains out with pre-natal pregnancy
vaccinations. In many Latin American countries, women are strongly
encouraged to get the Tdap vaccine no more than 22 weeks into
a pregnancy. Since the story line behind the Zika explanation
is patent bullshit, another vector is being used, which leaves
only the previously harmless Tdap vaccine as the only available
real "shrunken brain" transmission vector, BET ON IT. Ok so to sum this up: 1. Prior to 2015, the Zika virus was never associated with shrunken brains in newborn babies. 2. The propagation pattern is impossible, no mosquito borne disease that requires and intermediate host can get to all corners of a continent in only six months. Such a rapid propagation would require the disease to move 33 miles a day, day after day. Mosquitos do not breed, infect, lay eggs and hatch young to re-infect any faster than two weeks and won't fly more than half a mile during their lives, and if movement of people could spread it so fast, it would have happened decades ago. This disease might take six months to go 30 miles, not go 30 miles in a day! 3. The Zika virus has been known about since the 1950's, and requires a carrier host during it's life cycle. If it is so contagious it can rip across a continent via mosquitoes alone in only six months, which would require people flying around on airplanes to do, then it should have traveled across the ocean to Brazil as fast as an airplane can fly along with an infected host carrier from Africa, more than 50 years ago. 4. The autism / child vaccination link has now been so firmly drawn that the scammers need an entirely new venue before they get totally busted, and pre-birth vaccines have to be that venue. They need a safe way to do this and they are not going to get the job done by letting their weapon loose in the wild, where it can jump out of the bushes and nail them. They need a scapegoat for the intellectual damage they need to cause to maintain their future tyranny, and the zika virus is virtually assured to be their chosen scapegoat. 5. They claim this disease is ripping through the Caribbean island nations. QUESTION: HOW DOES A MOSQUITO BORNE ILLNESS, WHICH TOOK 50 YEARS TO JUMP FROM AFRICA TO LATIN AMERICA END UP PROPAGATING THROUGHOUT THE CARIBBEAN IN ONLY A FEW MONTHS, WHEN EACH LOCATION IN THE ENTIRE REGION IS, FROM A MOSQUITO'S STANDPOINT, EQUALLY SEPARATED BY OCEAN? Good question, and I have the answer, CASE CLOSED: I'll tell you what is going on here - VIRTUALLY ASSURED: Bill Gates or some other slime ball released a new vaccine in response to the autism uproar, which was to be administered to women while pregnant, to destroy the baby en utero so post-birth vaccines would not be blamed for damage they want to do to ALL children and are no longer completely getting away with. The zika virus has to be there to take the rap. A WARNING TO ALL WOMEN WORLDWIDE: AVOID ALL VACCINES DURING PREGNANCY, AND SPREAD THE WORD TO OTHERS, EVEN IF THEY THINK YOU ARE CRAZY FOR SAYING IT. THERE IS NO MOSQUITO BORNE DISEASE CAUSING THE SHRUNKEN BRAINS, LOGIC PROVES IT HAS TO BE ADMINISTERED BY INTENT. HERE ARE THE CAPTURES THAT PROVE IT:
More info
WATCH: Reporter Slams CDC for Vaccines & Autism Cover Up ‘This Is Not Theory’
Report Ben Swann is sick of what he is terming as a total cover up and fraud at the highest government levels. He’s long believed that the government covered up the connections and proof that vaccines cause autism and now he’s going public, slamming them in an investigative special.Ben Swann "What I am about
to share with you is not theory. This is a documented case of
massive corruption within the CDC and an attempt to change research,
protocols and ultimately hide their own findings."- Ben Swann
investigates the Truth behind the CDC, Vaccines and Autism
Het verzwijgen van het Zika virus In het verleden verzweeg
het Arubaanse ziekenhuis al de vele gevallen van Als we het verhaal van een bandabousche huisarts mogen geloven was er ook op ons eiland al veel eerder het Zika virus maar men mocht/kon het zogenaamd niet testen! Zika en Chikunguya worden zowel op Aruba als hier op Curaçao in vele gevallen verzwegen.
RIVM: ’Relatie zika en geboortedefecten nog niet aangetoond’ Britse wetenschappers hebben Europese paren opgeroepen ten minste 28 dagen geen onbeschermde seks te hebben na terugkeer uit een met het zikavirus besmet land, zoals Brazilië of Mexico (en nog 21 landen waar de zika-verspreiding thans is vastgesteld). Mannen zouden gedurende deze periode condooms moeten gebruiken, vrouwen zouden seks zónder dit voorbehoedmiddel moeten afwijzen – ook als zij nog maar kort in verwachting zijn. De achtergrond van hun waarschuwing is duidelijk: een zwangerschap zou kunnen eindigen met de geboorte van een kind met ’microcefalie’, een ernstige aandoening van het centraal zenuwstelsel waarbij de hersenen achterblijven in hun ontwikkeling en de schedel opvallend klein blijft: het voorhoofd is plat of smal, de oren in verhouding nogal groot. Bij ’kinderen met een klein hoofdje’ is dikwijls (maar niet altijd) sprake van ernstige verstandelijke beperking, al dan niet gecombineerd met een vertraagde motorische ontwikkeling en aangeboren afwijkingen in andere orgaansystemen. Microcefalie staat, aldus de Hersenstichting in Den Haag, niet altijd op zichzelf en kan onderdeel zijn van verschillende syndromen of chromosoomafwijkingen. Microcefalie kan infecties, stofwisselingsziekten maar ook een erfelijke aandoening als oorzaak hebben. De diagnose wordt gesteld door de schedelomvang te meten en die te vergelijken met wat normaal zou zijn op grond van zwangerschapsduur, leeftijd en/of geslacht. Met een CT-scan of MRI-scan van de hersenen kan de omvang van de aanlegstoornissen van de hersenen worden bepaald. De latere kansen van het kind zijn voor een belangrijk deel afhankelijk van welke hersengebieden zijn aangedaan dan wel ontbreken. Kinderen met microcefalie bewegen vaak onhandig en lomp, soms ook is er een slechte spiercoördinatie. Ze praten daardoor ook onduidelijk, dit speelt vooral bij jongens. Spasmen komen vaak voor. Deze vaak emotionele kinderen hebben iets meer kans op epilepsie, en later op hersentumoren. Dit bij velen onbekende
(schrik)beeld van kinderen met een kleine schedelvorm leidt momenteel
tot paniek op wereldschaal. Vergeten wordt evenwel dat dergelijke
kinderen reeds deel uitmaken van élke samenleving op aarde.
Ook de Nederlandse. Schattingen naar het vóórkomen
van microcefalie lopen uiteen van 1 op zesduizend tot 1 op 1300
pasgeborenen per jaar – zónder dat sprake is van een
zika-besmetting. Of het zika-virus ook daadwerkelijk leidt tot meer gevallen van microcefalie, zoals thans door zeer velen wordt aangenomen, is slechts een vermoeden. ,,En wetenschappelijk zeker nog niet aangetoond”, zegt dr. Aura Timen van het RIVM te Bilthoven. Zij is hoofd van het Centrum Landelijke Coördinatie Infectieziektenbestrijding. Wereldwijd vindt naar die klemmende vraag op dit moment onderzoek plaats, ook aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR). Timen: ,,De actuele
wetenschappelijke stand van zaken is deze: we hebben een onzekere
situatie rond zika. Inderdaad komt microcefalie óók
zónder het zikavirus voor. In een land als Brazilië
worden elk jaar circa 30.000 kinderen met een kleine schedel geboren.
De aanwijzing die ons grote zorgen baart is, dat in het noordoosten
van Brazilië nu opvallend veel meldingen komen over nieuwgeborenen
met een kleine schedel en een beperkte herseninhoud. Het gaat
hier om een gebied met een arme bevolking, een achterblijvende
infrastructuur en een slechte waterhuishouding waarin de Aedes-mug,
die het virus verspreidt, goed gedijt.”
Wat feiten op een rijtje omtrent het Zika-virus.
Feiten: Samenvatting: Nagekomen bericht: Eind 2014 is door de minister van Gezondheid van Brazilië bepaald dat zwangere vrouwen gevaccineerd moeten worden met DTaP-vaccin (Difterie, Tetanus en a-cellulair Pertussis (=Kinkhoest)). Deze campagne is in de eerste helft van 2015 gestart. Tel daar negen maanden zwangerschap bij op en dan valt dat precies samen met de golf van misvormingen bij babies die we nu zien. Het één (microcefalie) hoeft niet perse een gevolg te zijn van het ander (start vaccinaties bij zwangere vrouwen), maar het is wel erg toevallig qua timing. Feit: Van de stoffen in de vaccins is niet vastgesteld dat ze veilig zijn voor foetussen. Wederom een bewijs waar de misgeboren kinderen vandaan komen
Aedes mosquitos are
believed to be responsible for the spread of Zika. - Mario Tama/Getty
Images A worker sprays insecticide for mosquitos at a village in Bangkok, Thailand, January 13, 2016. Tropical Southeast Asian countries said on Friday they were bracing for the mosquito-borne Zika virus, with Malaysia saying it could "spread quickly" if introduced, but Thailand appeared to be bucking the trend with just a handful of cases a year. Picture taken January 13, 2016. © REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha A worker sprays insecticide for mosquitos at a village in Bangkok, Thailand, January 13, 2016. Tropical Southeast Asian countries said on Friday they were bracing for the mosquito-borne Zika virus, with Malaysia… Privately owned vaccine developer Hawaii Biotech Inc has joined the race to produce a vaccine for the mosquito-borne Zika virus, a fast-spreading infection which has been linked to severe birth defects in babies. The company initiated a formal program to test a Zika vaccine last fall, as the virus began to gain traction in Brazil, said Chief Executive Dr. Elliot Parks. "Right now, we are in the pre-clinical stage, as I suspect everyone is," Parks, a former Johnson & Johnson executive, told Reuters in an interview late on Thursday. The World Health Organization (WHO) has said the Zika virus is "spreading explosively" and could infect as many as 4 million people in the Americas. There is no proven vaccine or treatment. Although a direct causal relationship has not been established, a link is strongly suspected between Zika and thousands of children born in Brazil with abnormally small heads, brain defects and impaired vision. A close cousin of dengue and chikungunya, Zika causes mild fever and rash. But an estimated 80 percent of those infected suffer no symptoms, making it difficult for pregnant women to know whether they have been infected. "We will have data coming through this year," Parks said. "When we enter the clinic is yet to be determined." The United States has two potential candidates for a Zika vaccine and may begin clinical trials in people by the end of this year, but there will not be a widely available vaccine for several years, U.S. officials said on Thursday. Canadian scientist Gary Kobinger, who helped develop a trial vaccine that was successful in fighting Ebola, is part of a consortium working on a Zika vaccine that could be ready for emergency use before the end of the year. This week, GlaxoSmithKline Plc also said it was concluding studies to check whether its technology is suitable for the virus. Parks and his team at Hawaii Biotech are initially funding development themselves, while looking ultimately to partner with a big player that would have the ability to deliver a vaccine worldwide. The Honolulu, Hawaii-based company, which is also testing vaccines for infectious diseases including West Nile virus and chikungunya, sold its early-stage dengue vaccine candidate to Merck & Co Inc in 2010. It also has a tick-borne
encephalitis virus vaccine in the pre-clinical stage, funded by
a grant from the infectious disease arm of the National Institutes
of Health.
Zika Virus – What They Are Not Telling You? The recent outbreak of Zika virus in Brazil is now being linked to genetically modified mosquitoes developed by the British biotech company Oxitec, which is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Oxitec has been releasing the genetically modified Aedes mosquitoes into the wild in Brazil since 2011[1] to battle dengue fever. The company produces up two million genetically modified mosquitoes a week in its factory in Campinas, Brazil. The Aedes mosquito is the world’s most dominant variety of mosquito, and the only two countries in the Americas that don’t have this mosquito are Chile and Canada. The Zika virus, which has been detected in 18 of the 26 states in Brazil, is transmitted by the Aedes mosquito. Over 4,000 babies have now been born in Brazil with shrunken brains since November 1, 2015. Brazil normally gets approximately 150 cases of this type of birth defect each year, which means abnormal births of this type have increased by approximately 13,000 percent. While the Brazilian government rushes to blame the Zika virus for this huge rise in abnormal birth defects, the facts remain clear. Only a small number of babies with birth defects, who died, had the virus in their brain. This means a large number of the babies who died had no Zika virus in their brain. Hard to blame Zika then, which has been around since before 1948 and has never been known to cause birth defects. In fact, Zika makes only one in five people get “mildly” sick with flu-like symptoms, with no symptoms at all in 4 out of 5 people. So why are they quick to blame a generally benign Zika virus? In late 2014, the Brazilian minister of health announced that a new Tdap shot would be mandatory for all expectant mothers starting in 2015. Records now show that all mothers with birth defect babies received this newly formulated vaccine while pregnant. The timeliness of the Tdap vaccine and the rise in birth defects is more than just a little coincidental. The consequences of this untested vaccine is what is being swept under the rug. Which brings us once again to Bill Gates, the King of Eugenics and Vaccines. In 2015 the Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, received a $307,000 grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to study the immune responses of pregnant women who receive the Tdap (reduced-dose acellular pertussis vaccines combined with tetanus and diphtheria toxoids) vaccine. One cannot find the raw results. In 2011, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) issued a recommendation that pregnant women receive the Tdap shot at 20 weeks gestation. Tdap combines the Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis (whooping-cough) vaccines into a single jab. The Tdap shot has never been proven safe for use during pregnancy. In fact, Tdap is classified by the FDA as a Class C drug indicating it is NOT A SAFE CHOICE during pregnancy[2]. tdap Is it any wonder there was a rush to place the birth defect epidemic blame elsewhere? The fact that Brazil subjected its pregnant women to such a mandatory untested vaccine is genocidal, and now they know it. They bought the kool-aid without doing the precautionary research. Or perhaps they received enough money to look the other way. Consequently, the United States is now pushing to develop a vaccine for the Zika virus. Haven’t we been down this road before with mainstream media’s Ebola scares and the predictable rush to capitalize on a lucrative vaccine for all those in fear for their life (which they already had waiting in the wings)? To make matters worse, Brazil says they will mobilize 220,000 soldiers to fight the Zika virus. Soldiers are being ordered to go door-to-door to spray insecticides in neighborhoods to help kill mosquitoes. Toxic insecticide spraying around pregnant women and children? Are they insane? To compound the insanity further… The government says it will distribute mosquito repellent to some 400,000 pregnant women who receive cash-transfer benefits. Officials in El Salvador, Colombia and Brazil have also suggested women stop getting pregnant until the crisis has passed. Now, there’s a definite win for Bill Gates’ population control agenda. Just scare people into avoiding sex and getting pregnant. In fact, recently they suggested that the Zika virus “might be” a sexually transmitted disease, just because it was found in one man’s semen who had the Zika virus. They can try to plant the seeds of deadly fear once again, but don’t you believe a word of such nonsense. Pressure is building on the World Health Organization to declare Zika an emergency of international concern. Under the International Health Regulations, Director General Dr. Margaret Chan can establish an emergency committee, which can green light global vaccination campaigns with experimental vaccines. Are you getting the picture? There’s more to this story… Now, scientists in Brazil are studying genetic sequences of mosquitoes allegedly transmitting the Zika virus and other diseases to see whether changes have occurred that could have generated mutant mosquitoes. The mosquito Gates released was likely to be a long-term dream of his he had for forced birth control and forced vaccinations, which he has been working on since 2003. In the forced vaccination scenario, the mosquitoes are genetically programmed to produce the “vaccine” permanently once released into the environment, so they would not have to release new mosquitoes EVER again. Their effects would simply become part of nature. This means that at some time in your life you and everyone else is bound to be bitten by a mosquito created by Bill Gates. God help us all! Now in addition to this just have a look at who first gathered and retained a sample of the Zika Virus back in the 1940’s: http://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/products/all/VR-84 Thats right no other than the Rockefeller foundation.
Lokale angst campagne gestart Zika virus is geweldig
gevaarlijk voor zwangere vrouwen Definitie Microcefalie Wat vreemd is is dat
deze Microcafalie al altijd heeft bestaan en dat het altijd al
voorgekomen is sinds we praten over baby's laten inenten! Is het
niet dat er iets meer is met de inentingsvloeistof en dat men
dat aan het onderbrengen is onder een mug die misschien de vieze
reactie van de inenting versterkt! Bij een beschrijving vond ik
dit "zoals een infectie of te weinig zuurstof of alcohol
gebruik door de moeder tijdens de zwangerschap".
Het bewijs dat de wetenschap deze ziektes gekweken en rommelen met deze mug!! De Dengue, Chikunguya en Zika mug gecreëerd door de wetenschap! Er is een document
opgedoken in "de Wallstreet Journal" wat er uit blijkt
dat er alsmaar gerommeld is met de Dengue mug om deze zogenaamd
te bestrijden. Na deze experimenten zijn er in een rap tempo de
Chikunguya en Zika ontstaan die nu duidelijk gecreëerd is
door een ziekelijke wetenschap. Ik stelde in mijn vorige
stuk: Wat nu duidelijk is is dat juist de mug gecreëerd is om ziektes te verspreiden (onder het mom te bevechten) en dat samen met de vele zeer giftige inentingen die we toelaten door doktoren die menen onze kinderen kost wat kost te moeten vol spuiten met gif. De combinatie die nu is ontstaan, mug en inenting, is kennelijk een geweldige combinatie om kinderen een vreselijk leven te garanderen. Het stuk begint als
volgt: Mensen, het wordt tijd
dat we eens wakker gaan worden.
|
||||
LATEST BOOK Verboden Publicaties
Title: Verboden
Publicaties
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
We
are not responsible for the posts of the members
|
